You have to choose this article to write my assignment. I am going to send you the actual assignment requirement. Assignment should be written in APA format.
I am done with part 1 in which PICO question need to be develop. Please start from 2nd part. Thanks and for writing the assignment use the article attached .
Development of a well-formulated PIO/PICO(T) question according to Table 2.2 on p. 35 in the Polit and Beck (2021) text and provide justification from the literature for the development of the question. Total Points: 15
Systematic Review Critique Guideline Questions (Box 30.1, Guidelines for Critiquing Systematic Reviews, pp. 687-688 [light blue boxes only] in the Polit & Beck text).
The Problem: Did the report clearly state the research problem and/or research questions? Is the scope of the project appropriate? Were concepts, variables, or phenomenon adequately defined? Was the approach to integration adequately described and was the approach appropriate? 10 Points
Search Strategy: Did the report describe criteria for selecting primary studies, and are the criteria defensible? Were the bibliographic databases used by the reviewers identified, and are they appropriate and comprehensive? Were keywords identified, and are they exhaustive? Did the reviewers use adequate supplementary efforts to identify relevant studies? 10 Points
The Sample: Did the search strategy yield a good and thorough sample of studies? If an original report was lacking key information, did reviewers attempt to contact the original researchers for additional information or did the study have to be excluded? 10 Points
Quality Appraisal: Did the reviewers appraise the quality of the primary studies? Did they use a well-defined set of criteria or a well-validated quality appraisal scale? Did two or more people do the appraisals, and was interrater agreement reported? Was appraisal information used appropriately in selecting studies or analyzing results? 10 Points
Data Extraction: Was adequate information extracted about the study design, sample characteristics, and study findings? Were steps taken to enhance the integrity of the dataset (i.e. were two or more people used to extract and record information for analysis?) 10 Points
Data Analysis—General: Did the reviewers explain their method of pooling and integrating the data? Was the analysis of data thorough and credible? Were tables, figures, and text used effectively to summarize findings? 10 Points
Conclusions: Did the reviewers draw reasonable conclusions about the quality, quantity, and consistency of evidence relating to the research question? Are limitations of the review/synthesis noted? Are implications for nursing practice and further research clearly stated? 15 Points
APA format, grammar, spelling, on-time submission (-2 points/day starting from missed assignment deadline for dropbox submission without prior approval from Professor). 10 Points