Recent Question/Assignment
Each slide should have a max. of four points and four words per point.
Maximum slides for the presentation are FOUR slides.
Choose anyone topic from below
Case options (Lecturer approval required)
1. Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987)
2. ANZ v Westpac (1988)
3. Tabcorp Holdings v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd (2009)
4. Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991)
5. Koompahtoo Local Aborginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007)
6. Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail authority of NSW (1982)
7. Zhu v Treasurer of the State of NSW (2004)
8. Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Australia Pty Ltd (1986)
9. Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983)
10. Louth v Diprose (1992)
11. San Sebastian Pty Ltd v The Minister Administering Environmental, Planning and Assessment Act (1986)
12. Walton Stores (Interstate) v Maher (1988)
13. Imbree v McNeilly (2008)
14. Burnie Port Authority v General Jones (1994)
15. Agar v Hyde (2000)
16. Romeo v Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory (1998)
17. Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002)
18. Columbia Coffee & Tea Pty Ltd v Churchill (1992)
19. R Lowie Lippmann Figdor & Franck v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1992)
20. Nagel v Rottnest Island Authority (1993)
21. Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre v Anzil (2000)
22. Roads and Traffic Authority v Dederer (2007)
23. Esanda Finance v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997)
24. Fallas v Mourlas (2006)
25. Rogers v Whitaker (1992)
26. Caltex Oil v Dredge (1976)
27. Perre v Apand (1999)
28. L Shaddock v Parramatta City Council (1982)
29. Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980)
30. Hawkins v Clayton (1988)
31. Koehler v Cerebos (Aust) Ltd (2005)
32. Horne v Queensland (1995)
33. Peter Joseph Haylen v NSW Rugby Union Ltd (2002)
34. Flavel v State of SA (2008)
35. Tame v NSW (2001)
36. Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2001)
37. Hackshaw v Shaw (1984)
38. Baker v Gilbert (2003)
39. Australian Safeway Stores v Zaluzna (1987)
40. Bryan v Maloney (1995)
Maximum slides for the presentation are FOUR slides.
Choose anyone topic from below
Case options (Lecturer approval required)
1. Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987)
2. ANZ v Westpac (1988)
3. Tabcorp Holdings v Bowen Investments Pty Ltd (2009)
4. Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991)
5. Koompahtoo Local Aborginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007)
6. Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail authority of NSW (1982)
7. Zhu v Treasurer of the State of NSW (2004)
8. Darlington Futures Ltd v Delco Australia Pty Ltd (1986)
9. Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio (1983)
10. Louth v Diprose (1992)
11. San Sebastian Pty Ltd v The Minister Administering Environmental, Planning and Assessment Act (1986)
12. Walton Stores (Interstate) v Maher (1988)
13. Imbree v McNeilly (2008)
14. Burnie Port Authority v General Jones (1994)
15. Agar v Hyde (2000)
16. Romeo v Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory (1998)
17. Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002)
18. Columbia Coffee & Tea Pty Ltd v Churchill (1992)
19. R Lowie Lippmann Figdor & Franck v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1992)
20. Nagel v Rottnest Island Authority (1993)
21. Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre v Anzil (2000)
22. Roads and Traffic Authority v Dederer (2007)
23. Esanda Finance v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997)
24. Fallas v Mourlas (2006)
25. Rogers v Whitaker (1992)
26. Caltex Oil v Dredge (1976)
27. Perre v Apand (1999)
28. L Shaddock v Parramatta City Council (1982)
29. Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980)
30. Hawkins v Clayton (1988)
31. Koehler v Cerebos (Aust) Ltd (2005)
32. Horne v Queensland (1995)
33. Peter Joseph Haylen v NSW Rugby Union Ltd (2002)
34. Flavel v State of SA (2008)
35. Tame v NSW (2001)
36. Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2001)
37. Hackshaw v Shaw (1984)
38. Baker v Gilbert (2003)
39. Australian Safeway Stores v Zaluzna (1987)
40. Bryan v Maloney (1995)
Looking for answers ?
Recent Questions
Program: Master of Information SystemsAssessment 1: Portfolio 1 (Session 2 Topic: Input, Processing andOutput) Semester 2: Block 8-2024Course Code: MBIS4003 Course Title: Software Development Total Marks:...AssessmentAssessment item 2—Assignment 2Due date 11:45pm on Sunday, 24Nov.2024Weighting 35%Length Not applicableObjectivesThis assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes numbers 1, 2 and 3 as...Plan, construct and write a long-form essay on a particular area of media research that interests you. Using an established theoretical framework, explain how your research offers new insights into the...DescriptionIn this assessment, you are required to demonstrate that you understand how an Older Adult can develop mental health problems associated with cognitive decline leading to cognitive impairment...School of Engineering, Design and Built EnvironmentENGR7008 Fire Engineering Design and AssessmentAssignment 4: Peer Review of Fire Engineering ReportASSIGNMENT 4PEER REVIEW OF A FIRE ENGINEERING REPORTSee...Structural Analysis Etask 5The aim of this assessment task is to evaluate the appropriate use of the Force Method and Moment Distribution Method for structural analysis• Please download the eTask4 from...Purpose:The purpose of this task is for the student to demonstrate how to create a holistic plan of care that is person-centred, trauma-informed, and recovery-oriented in focus.Description:In this written...Show All Questions