MGT8027 PROJECT HR, COMMUNICATIONS & INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT
ASSIGNMENT 3 MARK SHEET
Student name
Student number (00)
It is recommended that you start writing your assignment on the last page of this document. Alternatively, you can attach your assignment to this mark sheet but be careful that formatting is the same for both documents before doing so.
Assignments submitted without this mark sheet will lose marks.
This mark sheet:
• provides students with details of the marking criteria for this assignment including penalties for non-compliance with specific requirements,
• acts as a checklist to ensure that students have addressed all requirements, and
• is used by markers for providing feedback and marks for the assignment.
FORMATTING
You may have to adjust the page formatting before attaching your assignment.
It is suggested that you use the following formatting for your assignment before pasting it onto the last page of this mark sheet:
TOP MARGIN – 2.5 cm
BOTTOM MARGIN – 2.5 cm
SIDE MARGINS – 2.5 cm
FILE NAMING / RENAMING GUIDELINES
With the use of Moodle for assignment submission, there is no need to include your name nor student number in the file name. Moodle inserts this information automatically.
Your assignment file name should simply be
MGT8027_2015_A3
IMPORTANT NOTE
Remember to submit a copy of your assignment (without this mark sheet and appendices) to Turnitin and to obtain an Originality Report for submission through EASE
www.turnitin.com
See the Introductory Materials for more information

MGT8027 ASSIGNMENT 3 MARK SHEET – PROJECT HR, COMMUNICATIONS & INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT
(Note to markers – indicate relevant cell in each row by highlighting text or cell)
Non-compliant Poor/inadequate Basic Adequate Good Excellent Mark
ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS (out of 70) 0 0 to 29 30 to 38 39 to 44 45 to 50 51 to 60 /60
Executive summary (ES) to indicate the nature of the assignment, background details, research findings and recommendations where appropriate, and to function as a stand-alone document No ES provided. Poor quality ES that does not provide the required information Basic ES that provides limited information, or does not provide information in a clear and concise manner Adequate ES that provides sufficient information Good ES providing the required information in a clear and concise manner Comprehensive ES providing the required information in a clear and concise manner, and able to function as a stand-alone document and/or presentation to a CEO
1a. Introduction – provide an explanation of the reason for preparing the document and a brief summary of the contents No introduction provided Poor introduction provided, or irrelevant information Basic introduction provided Adequate introduction provided Good clear introduction provided Clear, concise and comprehensive introduction providing essential details
1b. Background and environment of project – provide details of the project to understand the context of the analysis No background provided Poor background provided, or inadequate information provided Basic or limited background information provided Appropriate level of detail provided Good level of detail provided Clear, concise and comprehensive background providing essential details
2. Stakeholder communications management
• Stakeholder communications No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
3. Project Management Information System
• Role of the PMIS No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
• PMIS used in the project No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
• PMIS diagram No diagram provided Poor or inadequate diagram provided Basic or limited diagram provided Adequate diagram provided Good diagram provided Excellent diagram provided developed or adapted for this project
4. Project life cycle
• Life cycle of the project No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
• Life cycle diagram No diagram provided Poor or inadequate diagram provided Basic or limited diagram provided Adequate diagram provided Good diagram provided Excellent diagram provided developed or adapted for this project
• Critical success factors of the project No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
5. Project integration management
• Need for integration management No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
• Integration management diagram No diagram provided Poor or inadequate diagram provided Basic or limited diagram provided Adequate diagram provided Good diagram provided Excellent diagram provided developed or adapted for this project
• The project plan No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
6. Project monitoring and change control
• Need for change control No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
• Monitoring and change control system No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
7. Project closure
• How the project was ‘closed out’ No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
• Periodic reviews of project No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
• Post-completion review No discussion on the topic Poor or inadequate discussion on topic Basic discussion on topic and little use of theory Adequate discussion on topic using appropriate theory Good discussion on topic using appropriate theory Clear, concise and comprehensive discussion on the topic, supported by appropriate theory, figures and tables.
8. Conclusions – to provide a summary of the findings and ‘lessons learned’ from the analysis of the selected project, including any threats to the selected, or similar, projects No conclusions provided Poor or inadequate conclusions provided Basic conclusions provided Adequate conclusions derived from the preceding analysis Good conclusions derived from the preceding analysis Clear, concise and comprehensive conclusions derived from, and justifiably supported by, the preceding analysis
9. Recommendations – to provide recommendations in response to the specific conclusions and lessons learned No recommendations provided Poor or inadequate recommendations provided Basic recommendations provided Adequate recommendations provided Good recommendations provided Clear, concise and comprehensive recommendations, addressing the conclusions.
RESEARCH & ACADEMIC THEORY
(out of 30) 0 0 to 14 15-22 23 to 30 /30
Critical analysis uses appropriate theoretical principles as a framework for analysis No use of theoretical principles Poor or inadequate use of theoretical principles Adequate use of theoretical principles Extensive use of theoretical principles and appropriate application to the project and its environment
Argument is well structured, logical, and well-reasoned (compelling) No logical argument provided Poor or inadequate structure and argument Appropriate structure and argument Well structured, logical, and well-reasoned
Figures and tables effectively used and adapted in the analysis to clearly illustrate/compare/contrast theoretical principles with project practices. No use of tables and/or figures where their inclusion was justified Poor or inadequate usage of figures and tables Adequate usage of figures and tables Excellent usage and adaptation of figures and tables
Evidence of research to support the analysis and argument. No evidence of research into the topic Poor or inadequate evidence of research Adequate evidence of research beyond the study materials and set text Evidence of extensive research beyond the study materials and set text to support the analysis and argument
Evidence of knowledge of study materials and general knowledge of the project management domain No indication of knowledge of study materials Poor or inadequate indication of knowledge of study materials Indication of adequate knowledge of study materials Evidence of extensive knowledge of study materials and of PM domain
Quality of resources – use of research resources from quality sources (e.g. journal articles, texts, conference papers, etc) No use of research resources Poor quality sources of reference materials (e.g. websites, Wikipedia, etc) Adequate quality of sources of research Excellent sources of research resources, including journals, texts, conference papers, etc.
Citations are effectively and appropriately used No use of citations Poor or inadequate use of citations within the text Adequate use of citations within the text Extensive and appropriate use of citations to reflect use of theory in analysis and argument
List of references No list of references Poor or inadequate list of references ( 10) Adequate list of references ( 10) Comprehensive list of relevant references
Harvard referencing system is used and conforms to Harvard style as defined on USQ Library website (e.g. alphabetical order) No use of Harvard referencing system Poor or inadequate use of Harvard system of referencing Adequate use of Harvard system Comprehensive use of Harvard system in accordance with conventions of AGPS 6 style
PRESENTATION OF REPORT
(out of 10) 0 0 to 4 5 to 7 8 to 10 /10
Section Numbering - section and sub-section numbering to comply with normal conventions (e.g. set text by Summers & Smith - Communications Skills Handbook) No section numbering at all Little or no effective usage of section numbering Adequate usage of section numbering Excellent usage section numbering
Page Numbering - page numbering to comply with normal conventions (e.g. set text by Summers & Smith - Communications Skills Handbook) No page numbering at all Incorrect use of page numbering Adequate use of page numbering Correct use of page numbering
Table of contents – includes executive summary and all sections and subsections, list of references, list of appendices, list of figures and list of tables, all with page numbering No table of contents provided Incorrect or incomplete use of Table of contents Adequate use of Table of contents Correct use of table of contents
Language Skills - grammar, spelling, clear and concise writing style, correct punctuation Poor language skills Adequate language skills Excellent language skills
Word count Significantly over or under nominated word count Slightly over or under word count margins (+/- 10%) Within word count margins
* Total Assessment Mark (out of 100)

/100
Penalties applied to... Marks to be deducted for... Range of penalty Actual deduction
Mark sheet – to be attached to front of assignment No mark sheet 10
Turnitin Report – to be submitted with assignment No Turnitin originality report
(mark of 1/100 allocated until report submitted) 10
** Total Deducted Mark (TDM)
Overall Results
* Total Assessment Mark (TAM)
** Total Deducted Mark (TDM)
Final Assignment Mark = TAM - TDM
(capped at 1/100 until Turnitin originality report received)
Comments and feedback from Marker:
Ways to improve:

The balance of this page should be left blank.
Please start or attach your assignment on the following page