Unit Name: Transition to professional practices
Submit a minimum 1800 to 2000-word written evaluation on the transition framework based on the Schlossberg’s Theory and the way in which this framework applies to your own transition to professional practice. Your lecturer will explain this assessment to you in class time.
Topic: Transition to professional practices
1. INTODUCTION
2. DEFINATION OF TRANSITION
3. TYPES OF TRANSITION
1. Anticipated transition: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 2 examples.
2. Unanticipated transition: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
3. Non -event: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
4. Ripple Non-Events: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
5. Resultant Non-Events: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
6. Delayed non-events: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
7. Context: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
8. Impact: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
4. 4S’ S of transition
In this 4ss you need to explain each one with example.
1.Situation: What is situation in transition model? Give 2 example.
2.Self: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
3. Support: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
4.Strategies: Give definition in term of transition and explain with 1 example.
5. Barries of transition: All the types of barriers student need to explain with each example.
A. Personal and financial Barriers
B. Emotional and Physical Barriers
C. Career decision making and planning Barriers.
D. Placement Seeking Knowledge Barries
E. Education and training Barriers
6. Conclusion
7. References
Your essay should include reference to the weekly readings and at least 10 (scholarly) journal articles in APA7 REFRENCING STYLE The format of your report will be discussed in greater detail during tutorials.
Do NOT utilize sources such as www.tutor2u.com and other such web materials as these in no way constitute academic references for the purpose of your assignments. If you rely on such sources for theoretical support you will be deemed NOT to have met the requirements of the assessment
Assessment Criteria
Written essay
Criteria Weighting 100% HD D C P F
Analysis of literature on topic
35%
Conclusions derived from analysis and assessment of the topic
30%
Use and depth of research
20%
Presentation and referencing: effective and organised essay structure with correct referencing of up-to-date resources 15%
TOTAL
/30%
Criteria for essay High Distinction
80% - Distinction
70%- 79% Credit
60-69% Pass
50-59% Fail
0-49%
Analysis of literature on topic
Provides accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on most recent scholarly literature Provides accurate and complete explanations of how potential issues can be identified and drawing on relevant literature Explanations of how potential issues can be identified and often cites the relevant literature. Explanations of how potential issues are identified but not always accurate and sometimes incomplete, sometimes cites the relevant literature. Explanations of how potential issues can be identified, and research are inaccurate or incomplete, does not cite the relevant literature.
Conclusions derived from analysis and assessment of the topic Shows a deep understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population Shows an excellent understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population Shows a good understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population Shows a basic understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population Shows poor, insufficient understanding of how potential issues can be identified and their impact on targeted population
Use and depth of reflection A comprehensive analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows insightful synthesis of the literature information, including analysis of gaps and/or limitations of the research A strong analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows insightful synthesis of the literature information, including analysis of gaps and/or limitations of the research A good analysis is developed. Summarizes and shows some insightful synthesis of the literature information, identifies some limitations of the research Analysis is fairly well developed. It summarizes the overall information obtained from the literature reviews and synthesizes adequately the knowledge gained Analysis is not well developed. It lacks summary and/or any synthesis of the relevant literature
Presentation of summary and correct references used All levels of content are covered in depth. Wide range of contemporary references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made High level of content is covered in depth. Wide range of good references and sources are well cited when specific statements are made Appropriate content is covered in reasonable depth. Sources are generally well cited when specific statements are made Most major sections of the relevant content included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected
References were basic and some errors of citation Major sections of relevant content have been omitted or missed Inadequate references and poor citation
TOTAL
GET ANSWERS / LIVE CHAT