Diploma of in Community Health Care and Support (Level 7)
Course Code & Title: HLTH6001: Primary Health Care
Course Credits: 15
Assessment No. and Type: Assessment 2 – Individual Presentation
Level: 6
Version: 3.2
Term & Cohort:
Due Date:
Assessment Weighting 40%
Time: 15 minutes
Total Mark: 100
Tutor’s Name:
Purpose:
• To explore the effects of socio-political and cultural determinants of health and apply relevant knowledge to enhance the of health of individuals, whanau/family, organisations and communities.
• To examine the concepts of health promotion, health prevention, injury and primary health in relation to the needs of individuals, whanau/family, organisations and communities.
• To examine the governance structure, policy, legislation and fiscal influences of health care services Aotearoa/New Zealand.
• To critique Ministry of health strategies, guidelines ad initiatives that impact on individual groups within society.
• To engage in analytical and inquiry processes to develop as community and/or organizational healthcare promotion professionals.
Graduate Profile Outcomes (GPO’s)
GPO1: Competently apply knowledge relevant to health issues to assist in the enhancement of the health of the individual, whanau/family, organisations and communities.
GPO2: Critically assess ways in which socio-cultural, economic and physical environments are determinants of the health of the individual, whanau/family, organisations and communities.
GPO3: Evaluate how well the holistic health needs of the individual, whanau/family, organisations and communities are met through the provision of and access to health services.
GPO4: Research, articulate and apply knowledge and skills relevant to ethical and effective health promotion practice within their work context Learning outcomes:
LO4: Analyse Aotearoa/New Zealand health governance structure, health strategies, guidelines, initiatives and the provider/funding arm in view of health outcomes for individuals,
whanau/family, organisations and communities
LO5: Critically examine the role of government in determining policies and legislation that
influence healthcare outcomes.
To pass the assessment, you must meet all the stated learning outcomes (LOs) and must achieve 50% marks in tasks addressing the LOs.
Assessment 2
Task: Individual Presentation
Weighting: 40%
Time : 15 minutes
In this presentation you will analyse healthcare legislation, policies and funding that impact on healthcare strategies (long term approaches and action plans) and then explain to the audience, how successful your chosen Aotearoa/New Zealand health strategy has been and why.
Your presentation could be structured as follows:
1. Introduction (LO 4,5)
a. An overview of relevant healthcare legislation and policies.
b. Your chosen healthcare strategy, including your reason/s for choosing the strategy.
2. Analysis of the relevant legislation and policies that support your chosen healthcare
strategy. (LO5)
3. Analysis of the impact of the healthcare strategy on health outcomes of individuals, whanau/family, organisations and communities (LO4)
4. Analysis of funding and financial support for your chosen healthcare strategy.
(LO4)
5. How and why has your chosen health strategy has been successful (or how and why did
it fail?). (LO4)
6. Conclusion
A copy of your PowerPoint slides (and presentation notes if you have any), including full references, must be uploaded on Canvas through Turnitin before your presentation.
Your tutor can ask you to present either face 2 face on campus or through online LMS (Canvas). Please note, your presentation would be recorded for moderation purposes.
Marking Criteria
HLTH6001: Primary Health Care
Criteria Marks
1. Introduction: LO4,5
a An overview of relevant healthcare legislation and polices.
The overview of relevant healthcare legislation and policies is clear and concise. The overview of relevant healthcare legislation and policies is clear but brief. The overview of healthcare legislation and policies are relevant but not clear. Healthcare legislation and /or policies are not relevant or inaccurately given. No attempt to give an overview of relevant healthcare legislation and/or policies.
5 4 3 2_1 0 /5
b Your chosen healthcare strategy, including your reason/s for choosing the strategy.
The choice of healthcare strategies and reasons for choosing them are clearly well considered and justified. The choice of healthcare strategies and reasons for choosing them are justified but not clearly. The choice of healthcare strategies and reasons for choosing them are limited. Chosen healthcare strategies are not relevant and/or reasons for the choice are not valid. No attempt to choose relevant healthcare strategies and/or give reasons.
5 4 3 2_1 0 /5
LO4
2 Analysis of the relevant legislation and policies that Analysis of legislation and policies is clear, Analysis of legislation and policies is provided Analysis of legislation and policies is general Analysis of legislation and policies is Attempts to analyse relevant legislation and/or
Assignment 2: Individual Presentation
Student name: Student ID: Mark: /100 Date:
support your chosen healthcare strategy.
robust and in depth with relevant supporting evidence. with relevant supporting evidence but lacks clarity and detail. and brief with some supporting evidence. descriptive with no supporting evidence. policies is inadequate, unclear and/or not relevant.
20- 17 16 - 13 12 - 10 9 - 5 4- 0 /20
LO5
3 Analysis of the impact of the healthcare strategy on health outcomes of individuals, whanau/family, organisations and communities.
The impact of the healthcare strategy on health outcomes of individuals, whanau/family, organisations and communities is analysed clearly and in-depth with relevant supporting evidence.
The impact of the healthcare strategy on health outcomes of individuals, whanau/family, organisations and communities is analysed with relevant supporting evidence but needs more clarity or detail.
Analysis of the impact of the healthcare strategy on health outcomes of individuals, whanau/family, organisations and communities is general with some
relevant supporting evidence.
Analysis of the impact of the healthcare strategy on health outcomes of individuals, whanau/family, organisations and communities is descriptive with no supporting evidence.
Attempts to analyse the impact of the healthcare strategy on health outcomes of individuals, whanau/family, organisations and communities is either inadequate, unclear and/or not relevant.
20 - 17 16 - 13 12 - 10 9 - 5 4 - 0 /20
LO4
4 Analysis of funding and financial support for chosen healthcare strategy.
Analysis of funding and financial support for chosen healthcare strategy
is clear, robust and in depth with relevant supporting evidence. Analysis of funding and financial support for chosen healthcare strategy is provided with relevant supporting evidence but need Analysis of funding and financial support for chosen healthcare strategy is general and brief and provided with Analysis of funding and financial
support for chosen
healthcare strategy
is descriptive with no supporting evidence. Limited or no attempt to analyse funding and financial support for chosen healthcare strategy.
more clarity and detail. some relevant evidence.
20-17 16-13 12-10 9-5 4-0 /20
LO5
5 How and why has your chosen health strategy been successful (or how and why did it fail?).
Explanations of how and why the chosen health strategy were successful (or failed) are clear, relevant and realistic, with strong supporting examples. Explanations of how and why the chosen health strategy were successful (or failed) are mostly clear, with acceptable supporting examples. Explanations of how and why the chosen health strategy had been successful (or failed) are relevant, with weak supporting examples. Explanations of how and why the chosen health strategy had been successful (or failed) are either general or irrelevant, with weak or no supporting examples. Limited or no attempts to explain how and why the chosen health strategy had been successful (or failed) and/or give examples.
20 - 17 16 - 13 12 - 10 9 - 5 4 - 0 /20
6 Conclusion All main points are clearly and concisely summarised. Most of main points
are clearly summarised. An attempt is made to summarise the main points. Attempts to summarise the main points are too vague and/or not relevant. Limited or no attempt to summarise the main points.
5 4 3 2 1-0 /5
7 Presentation skills The presentation held the assessor’s attention. It was presented with enthusiasm, wellconstructed and timely. The presentation held the assessor’s attention. It was presented with
careful consideration, wellconstructed and timely. The assessor had to concentrate to follow as the presenter lacked confidence. The presentation was timely with some structure. The presentation was confusing and very difficult to follow and/or not timely. No attempt to give a coherent presentation.
5 4 3 2-1 0 /5
Total /100
Please note, there will not be any provision of 0.5 marks. This means the tasks with total marks of 5,15 or 25, you need to get 3,8 and 13 marks respectively to achieve the LO.
Assessor name:
Date:
GET ANSWERS / LIVE CHAT