RECENT ASSIGNMENT

ASSESSMENT BRIEF 2021-2022
Programme: BSc (Hons) Health, Safety and Environmental Management
Module Code/Module Title: BN 3720/Health and Safety Management
Module Tutor: Eldar Abdullayev
Assessment Title/ Number: Coursework 1(CW-1) Report
Date of Issue: 14 February, 2022
Date of Submission: 22 March, 2022
Date of Presentation:
(Tick in the appropriate box)
You are encouraged to word process your assessment, although hand written work is acceptable.
You are required to word process this assessment. P
You are required to submit this assessment electronically through Black Board P
Instructions:
• This paper contains 1 tasks/questions.
• Answer the questions / complete the tasks fully with all possible evidence for achieving the learning outcome/s.
Please do not submit this assessment brief with your work.
• This assessment is worth 50% of the module mark.
ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET 2021-2022
Programme: BSc (Hons) Health, Safety and Environmental Management
Module Title/Module Code: BN 3720/Health and Safety Management
Student Name:
UCLan ID:
Assessment Title/ Number:
Date of Submission:
Date of Presentation:
I confirm that this piece of work which I have submitted is all my own work and that references and quotations from both primary and secondary sources have been fully identified and properly acknowledged. I am fully aware that plagiarism and collusion are academic offences.
I also confirm that I have not used translation services or translation software in the production of this assignment.
Student’s signature:
Date:
Please note the following penalties for late submission:
Date of Submission Maximum Mark
1-5 working days late 40%
More than 5 working days late 0%
Question/ Task Max. Mark Mark in Percentage
1st Marker 2nd Marker* UCLan Verification External Examiner Initials
Name: Name: Name: Name:
Date: Date: Date: Date:
* 2nd Marking on sample basis. Please note that all marks are provisional subject to confirmation by the Module Assessment Board of the University of Central Lancashire, UK.
TASK:
Health and safety management in manufacturing industries plays a significant role in ensuring the intended targets and outcomes are achieved as per the industries strategic plan, with this in mind, you are requiring writing a report considering the following points:
Discuss the main elements of Health and safety management system (HSEMS).
Outline the most significant hazards in the manufacturing industry.
Discuss the role of enforcement authority to ensure health, safety and wellbeing of workers within the manufacturing industry.
Outline health and safety legislation that is relevant to a manufacturing industry's operation and its impacts on safety outcomes.
The Report must include:
This assessment is individual, and it requires each student to prepare a report of 2500 words. The report should include a critical analysis of the below mentioned aspects.
• Introduction
• Discuss the main elements of Health and safety management system (HSEMS).
• Outline the most significant hazards in the manufacturing industry.
• Discuss the role of enforcement authority to ensure health, safety and wellbeing of workers within the manufacturing industry.
• Outline health and safety legislation that is relevant to a manufacturing industry's operation and its impacts on safety outcomes.
• Conclusions and recommendations
• References
Guidelines:
1. Do not include your name in the assignment as it will be submitted on Blackboard.
2. Include a title page with the title of the assignment.
3. The work must be written in sentences and paragraphs, formal English, in third person with appropriate references as it will be published in an academic journal.
4. Materials should be obtained from the UCLan library and other academic sources.
5. Harvard style should be followed for Referencing and citations throughout the assignment.
6. Use your own judgement regarding headings. Be guided by the articles found in the UCLan library. Do not include content lists, charts, photographs, page borders in your work.
7. The report should normally contain an introduction, 4 body paragraphs and a conclusion with appropriate sections explaining the details.
1. Use Microsoft Word for word processing.
2. Page setup margins normal. Use A4 paper size settings and use 1- margins all around, Leave the Gutter at 0 cm.
3. Body text
Ø Font: Times New Roman
Ø Font size: 12
Ø Space: 1.5
Ø Paragraph: Justified. Leave one blank line between paragraphs.
4. The pages should be numbered consecutively, starting from introduction page; however, the title page should not be numbered.
5. All symbols and abbreviations must be defined and used only when absolutely necessary.
6. The number of words must be shown at the end of the work submitted. The title page and contents page will not count; neither will the list of reference at the end of the work.
7. As an indication, word count should not exceed the specified number.
8. Do not forget to reference your work properly; otherwise you will put yourself at the risk of “PLAGIARISM”.
9. You are advised to use different references to complete this assignment, some of which need to be books.
10. Remember that the style of your work, and its language accuracy, are indicators of how much care you have given to the assignment, and how capable are you in expressing your thoughts in a presentable and professional way.
11. The piece of course work should be submitted using TurnitinUK in UCLan blackboard.
12. The module tutor would take decision to evaluate your work based on the similarity index from the Turnitin submissions, however there is no acceptable limit and it’s based on the judgement.
13. There are nominal marks allotted for the document structure and format of the report and it’s important to follow all the assessment instruction while preparing.
14. There is no possible extension allowed beyond the due date for submissions in the blackboard Turnitin.
Academic Misconduct Definitions
• Cheating is any deliberate attempt to deceive and covers a range of offences described in the ICEM Policy on Unfair Means to Enhance Performance.
• Plagiarism describes copying from the works of another person without suitably attributing the published or unpublished works of others.
• Collusion is an attempt to deceive the examiners by disguising the true authorship of an assignment by copying, or imitating in close detail another student’s work - this includes with the other student’s consent and also when 2 or more students divide the elements of an assignment amongst themselves and copy one another’s answers.
• Re-presentation is an attempt to gain credit twice for the same piece of work.
• Fabrication is making up research data or results and reporting the same.
• Falsification is manipulating the research data or results such that inaccurate information is reported.
Accepted Similarity Index
• The College uses an online Assessment Tool called Turnitin. Students are required to self-submit their own assignment on Turnitin and will be given access to the Originality Reports arising from each submission.
• The accepted similarity percentage for an assessment is about 10%. However, the case may still be reported for investigation if the similarity percentage is below 10% subject to the Module Tutor’s academic judgment.
• Similarity percentages above 10 % will be reported to the Unfair Means to Enhance Performance Committee subject to the discussion with the Module Tutor/justification from the Module Tutor. The case may or may not be formally investigated.
Penalties of Academic Misconduct
All instances or allegations of the use of unfair means within summative assessment will be investigated in line with the college UMEP policy. If an allegation is found to be proven, then the appropriate penalty will be implemented:
• For the first time: the penalty will be 0% for the element of assessment, the plagiarized element of assessment must be resubmitted to the required standard and the mark for the module following resubmission will be restricted to the minimum pass mark (i.e. 40%).
• In the event of a repeat offence of cheating, plagiarism, collusion or re-presentation on the same or any other module within the course; the appropriate penalty will be 0% for the module with no opportunity for reassessment and you being able to retake the module in a subsequent year.
Marking Criteria
• The course work will be assessed and graded based on the marking criteria given below
LEVEL SIX
FIRST
(80-100%) Written work is directly relevant to the title. Knowledge and understanding is comprehensive in both breadth and depth. Student demonstrates an exceptional ability to contextualise, to critically appreciate concepts and their inter-relationship, and/or to relate theory with evidence. Exceptional ability to apply, in the right measure, the skills necessary to achieve a desired outcome. Evidence of very extensive, if not exhaustive reading and study beyond the course content. Clear evidence of independent thought. The presentation is highly sophisticated, fluent and accurate and in an appropriate format. The material is presented in a focused way, so as to help sustain the argument. Citation and referencing are impeccable. The work may be as good, if not better, than you imagine a professional tutor could write, and is possibly of publishable quality.
FIRST
(70-79%) Written work is directly relevant to the title. Knowledge and understanding is comprehensive in both breadth and depth. Student demonstrates a clear ability to contextualise, to critically appreciate concepts and their inter-relationship, and/or to relate theory with evidence. Outstanding ability to apply, in the right measure, the skills necessary to achieve a desired outcome. Evidence of extensive reading and study beyond the course content. Clear evidence of independent thought. The presentation is highly sophisticated, fluent and accurate and in an appropriate format. The material is presented in a focused way, so as to help sustain the argument. Citation and referencing are impeccable.
UPPER SECOND
(60-69%) Written work is directly relevant to the title. The knowledge-base is up-to-date and relevant, but may also be broad or deep. Work reflects a thorough grasp of concepts and of the inter-relationship, and a significant ability to relate theory to practice. The presentation is very good and in an appropriate format, the material generally well focused, reflecting a high degree of literacy. Arguments may sometimes be outstanding and reflective of genuine independent thought, but are not always consistently at that level. Material is very well presented and citation and referencing are very good.
LOWER SECOND
(50-59%) Written work is directly relevant to the title. Arguments may be generally relevant but not necessarily comprehensive. The student displays an awareness of what concepts are, but the ability to conceptualise, and/or to relate theory to evidence, is clearly limited. Frequent use of assertion rather than argument. Grammar and spelling sound, but perhaps with occasional lapses. Material is well presented and in an appropriate format. Citation and referencing are generally good but may contain some errors.
THIRD
(40-49%) Written work is predominantly relevant to the title. Knowledge is adequate but limited and/or superficial, with a tendency to inaccuracy. Limited awareness of concepts. Limited ability to contextualise, and to relate theory to evidence. Frequently, evidence (which may be accurate) is deployed superficially with lack of focus. Almost always offers description/assertion rather than argument. Grammar may be poor, or the linkage between paragraphs may be weak. Competent presentation and an acceptable format, although deficiencies are clearly evident. Citation and referencing are present but may contain quite a few errors.
COMPENSATABLE FAIL
(35-39%) At least 45% of material presented is relevant but there may be limited reference to the question. A generally poor but compensatable answer with extensive errors and omissions, or a substantial answer on the general topic in which the specific, central question is misinterpreted or avoided, or a very good essay in note form. Presentation is poor and sometimes inarticulate. Little evidence of appropriate reading but citation and referencing must be present, although there may be a substantial number of errors. (Note – absence of citation and referencing at Level 3 must be regarded as a clear failure and must be awarded 30%))..
UNCOMPENSATABLE FAIL
(30-34%) presented is relevant but there may be limited reference to the question. A generally poor but compensatable answer with extensive errors and omissions, or a substantial answer on the general topic in which the specific, central question is misinterpreted or avoided, or a very good essay in note form. Presentation is poor and sometimes inarticulate. Little evidence of appropriate reading but citation and referencing must be present, there may be a substantial number of errors. (Note – absence of citation and referencing at Level 3 must be regarded as a clear failure and must be awarded 30%).
FAIL
(20-29%) Less than 40% of material presented is relevant. . A generally weak answer with extensive errors and omissions, or a quite substantial answer on the general topic in which the specific, central question is misinterpreted or avoided. Limited understanding demonstrated. Presentation is poor, often inarticulate and sometimes incomprehensible. Very limited evidence of background reading; citation and referencing may be absent
FAIL
(10-19%) An exceptionally poor answer with extensive errors and omissions and limited evidence of relevant knowledge, or a good essay in note form. Presentation is very poor, often inarticulate and incomprehensible. No evidence of background reading.
FAIL
(0-9%) Answer not attempted, or limited to only a few paragraphs, or of little or no relevance to the general topic of the question. Zero is reserved for failure to attempt an answer, or no, or late submission.