RECENT ASSIGNMENT

Assessment Information 3
Subject Code: HAT201
Subject Name: Introduction to Hospitality and Tourism
Assessment Title: Length: Case Study Analysis
1500 words (+/- 10% allowable range)
Weighting: 40%
Total Marks:
Submission: 100
Online via Turnitin
Due Date: Week 13
.
Assessment Description
.
The purpose of this individual case study analysis is to further your skills in applying relevant Hospitality and Tourism analysis tools. It will also test your ability to identify a range of Hospitality and Tourism related problems, and it’s ethical implications. This will enable you to apply ethical standards to a variety of situations arising in the Hospitality and Tourism Context.
You are to watch the following video:
Vanuatu’s Broken Dreams
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMACsi8j3us
In preparing your analysis, you must answer the following questions:
1. Identify and discuss the prime ethical and governing issues presented in Vanuatu’s Broken Dream video.
2. Did PO Cruises act ethically in this case? Justify your answer.
3. Who should be responsible for rectifying issued that you have identified? Why? Explain your reasoning.
4. Discuss how Australian and/or Vanuatu’s governments could have resolved identified issues.
Justify your answer.
5. Suggest at least three recommendations to overcome such issues in the future.
You are required to use at least 8 sources of information that are referenced in accordance with Kaplan Harvard Referencing Guide. These may include corporate websites, government publications, industry reports, census data, journal articles, newspaper articles, and textbook material.
o .
.
.
.
.
Assignment Submission
This file must be submitted as a ‘PDF’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. Turnitin will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your lecturer via email and provide a brief description of the issue and a screenshot of the Turnitin error message.
You are also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties that may occur
Late assignment submission penalties
Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late assignment submission penalties” policy.
Number of days Penalty
1* - 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available
10 - 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available.
After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s).
Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students
*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty
For more information, please read the full policy via:
https://www.kbs.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/KBS_FORM_AssessmentPolicy_MAR2018_FA.pdf
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
For details on academic integrity policies and penalties, the reassessment process, and the appeals process, please refer to http://www.kbs.edu.au/current-students/student-policies/.
Word Limits for Written Assessments
Submissions that exceed the word count by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Success Centre representative or refer to the study help on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. You can find this by clicking on the top page toolbar:
My Services Academic Success Centre Study Support Resources
HAT201 Assessment 3 Marking Rubric – Case Study Analysis 40%
Marking Criteria NN (Fail) 0 – 49% P (Pass) 50 – 64% CR (Credit) 65 – 74% DN (Distinction) 75 – 84% HD (High Distinction) 85 – 100%
Analysis of
Identified Issues
/30 marks
Your analysis lacks depth, and your interpretation is not relevant to the assessment criteria.
You briefly analyse some of the issues, and your interpretation is not always relevant to the assessment criteria.
You analyse most of the issues, and your interpretation is well structured.
You analyse and interpret issues thoroughly.
You analyse and interpret the issues articulately and convincingly.
Recommendations
/30 marks
The quality of your recommendations is poor and/or incoherent.
You have drawn some useful recommendations although a
more comprehensive analysis of the case study would have been helpful.
You have drawn mostly useful recommendations.
You have drawn varied, wellresearched and compelling recommendations.
You have drawn dynamic, comprehensive and convincing recommendations.
Research
/20 marks
Your research lacks focus because of an unsuitable choice of sources.
You have selected some appropriate scholarly sources.
Better use of quality sources would help focus your research.
Your research is focused,
drawn from an appropriate range of scholarly sources.
It is obvious that your research is focused, complemented by a quality selection and range of scholarly sources.
It is clearly obvious that your research is extensive and focused, complemented by a quality
selection and range of scholarly sources.
Format
/20 marks
Total Marks
/100
Spelling and/or grammar is consistently incorrect, impacting
on the flow and readability of your analysis.
The format chosen for your analysis lacks thought and
consideration for the intended audience.
In-text referencing and/or reference list is mostly incorrect or non-existent.
Even though grammar and spelling are an issue, they do not detract very much from the
readability of your analysis.
The format chosen for your analysis is appropriate, but major improvements would enhance its presentation.
In-text referencing and the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with major errors.
Mostly correct grammar and spelling are very good but with occasional errors.
The format chosen for your analysis is appropriate, but some improvements would
enhance its presentation.
In-text referencing and the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing
Style, with minor errors throughout and the occasional major error.
Errors in grammar and spelling are rare.
Your analysis is professionally presented and has been
submitted in the appropriate format.
In-text referencing and the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing
Style, with only the occasional minor error.
Correct grammar and spelling throughout the analysis with no obvious errors.
Your analysis is professionally presented and exceeds
expectations in what is evidently suitable for a high-grade
commercial environment.
In-text referencing and the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan
Harvard Referencing Style, with no errors.
Feedback and Grades will be released via Turnitin
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.