Please use the draft attached to make the final report.
You guys did that draft. See MAN190113524
Assessment 2 Information
Subject Code: HRM201
Subject Name: Human Resource Management
Assessment Title: Individual Report – Part 1: Report Draft and Part 2: Report
Weighting: 40%
Total Marks: 40 Marks - Part 1: Report Draft 10 Marks and Part 2: Report 30 Marks
Due Date: Part 1: Report Draft due week 7 - Wednesday 3.55pm (AEDT)
Part 2: Report due week 10 - Monday 3.55pm (AEDT)
Assessment Description – Part 2 Report
Length: 1500 words
Case Study: Select one of the following companies, Commonwealth Bank, Virgin Australia, Accor Hotels, or Woolworths Group.
Your Task: Using the company of choice and outline, analyse and evaluate the human resource management system that the company is using to achieve its key strategic goals. You will need to research current theories and practices from the literature as they relate to the content covered in class during weeks 4 (job Analysis & design, work life balance), 5 (recruiting & selecting employees) and 7 (managing employee performance). This research should be used to provide evidence that supports your evaluation and recommendations.
The assessment is to be presented in a Report Format using headings and requires the following sections:
• Cover page
• Executive Summary
• Table of contents
• 1.0 Introduction (100 words) – state simply the purpose of the report and the structure you will follow
• 2.0 Overview of the company (200 words) – a general description of the company and its strategic objectives
• 3.0 Human Resource Management (HRM) – your own research on the following:
- Provide a situational analysis of the human resource management strategies the company under investigation utilises (250 words). In other words what do they currently do.
- Evaluate and justify the human resource management (HRM) strategies (300 words). To justify you will need to support your evaluation with theory.
- Discuss the fit between the HRM and the company strategy (250 words).
• 4.0 Conclusion (150 words) – a summary of the key information you identified in your report
• 5.0 Recommendations (250 words) – Make recommendations on how the HRMS could be improved. There needs to be a connection between your analysis and justification to your recommendations
• 6.0 Reflections on feedback (100 words) – Provide reflective comments on the feedback you received on your draft and the changes you made as a result
• Reference List
Please refer to the marking criteria as a guideline to help you complete the report.
Reference guide: Use a minimum of five references. This may include weekly readings, text books, news articles from respected publications, and journal articles. Referencing should be in the Harvard style – please refer to Kaplan’s ‘Harvard Referencing Guide’.
KBS presentation guidelines: Arial, size 11 font, 1.5 spacing
Submission: PDF and submit to Turnitin by the due date. Late submissions will incur a late penalty.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment Information
Assessment Marking Rubric
Criteria HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% DN (Distinction)
75%-84% CR (Credit) 74%-65% P (Pass)
50%-64% NN (Fail)
0%-49% Score
Report Structure
10 Marks • Executive summary concisely provides a detailed summary of the report content
• Introduction includes background, purpose and scope
• Discussion analyses the situation and develops a clear, logical, advanced argument
• Conclusion accurately summarises the report
• Recommendations are
clear, logical and is well detailed.
• Response to feedback is explicit and has extensive description of actions taken • Graphics are appropriate, labelled and placed close to the text that refers to them.
• Executive summary
covers the report with a general link to the content
• Introduction includes background, purpose and scope
• Discussion analyses the situation and develops a clear, logical argument
• Conclusion accurately summarises the report
• Recommendations
are clear and detailed
• Response to feedback is detailed with a sound description of actions taken
• Graphics are appropriate and labelled. • Executive summary summarises most of the report content
• Introduction includes most relevant information
• Discussion analyses the situation
• Conclusion summarises the report
• Recommendations are
clear
• There has been a response to feedback with some actions noted
• Graphics are appropriate.
• Executive summary is included • Introduction includes some required information
• Discussion analyses some elements of the situation
• Conclusion does not fully reflect the contents of the report
• Recommendation included • Includes a very generalised response to feedback
• Graphics are used to illustrate points but not fully discussed.
• Executive summary is not included
• Introduction does not include background or purpose of report
• Discussion does not describe or analyse the major elements of the situation
• Conclusion does not reflect the contents of the report
• Inappropriate
recommendations included • There is no response to feedback or it has been fabricated
• Graphics (if included) do not relate to the discussion.
/10
Research and
Analysis
10 Marks
• Research covers all areas outlined in the instructions within the word limit
• Discussion is of appropriate depth and all aspects of the discussion are relevant to the situation
• Analysis demonstrates critical understanding and
results in valid judgements and recommendations
• Discussion equitably compares the perspectives of different sources • Research covers main areas outlined in the instructions within the word limit
• Discussion is of appropriate depth and most aspects of the discussion are relevant to the situation
• Analysis results in valid
judgements and recommendations
• Discussion compares the perspectives of different sources • Research covers most areas outlined in the instructions within the word limit
• Discussion is of appropriate depth and some aspects of the discussion are relevant to the situation
• Analysis mainly results in valid judgements and recommendations
• Discussion compares the perspectives of different sources • Research covers some areas outlined in the instructions within the word limit
• Most aspects of the discussion are relevant to the situation but not in depth
• Analysis demonstrates some understanding to lead to judgements and recommendations
• Discussion does not fully consider perspectives of different sources • Research does not cover many areas outlined in the instructions
• Many aspects of the discussion are not relevant to the situation
• Analysis does not fully understand the situation to provide judgements and recommendations
• Discussion does not consider perspectives of different sources
• Discussion is unsupported by relevant sources
(references)
/10
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
• Discussion is supported by a substantial range of credible, current sources (references)
• Argument is persuasive and is ordered logically • Discussion is supported by credible, current sources (references)
• Argument is ordered
logically • Discussion is supported by a range of sources
(references)
• Argument is ordered logically in most sections. • Discussion is supported by some sources (references) but they are not always credible or current
• Argument is not persuasive and could be more logically ordered. • Argument is not persuasive
Language and
presentation
10 Marks
• Sentences and paragraphs are well structured and clear.
• Vocabulary is professional, appropriate and extensive
• Grammar, spelling and punctuation are flawless.
• Document professionally presented in terms of KBS guidelines
• Intext referencing and reference list format correct to the Harvard Reference style
• Sentences and paragraphs are well structured and clear with minor exceptions.
• Vocabulary is professional and appropriate.
• Grammar, spelling and punctuation are good.
• . Document professionally presented in terms of KBS guidelines
• Intext referencing and reference list format correct to the Harvard Reference style with minor exceptions
• Sentences and paragraphs are mainly well structured
• Vocabulary is comprehensive
• Few errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation
• . Document professionally presented in terms of KBS guidelines with few exceptions
• Intext referencing and reference list format correct to the Harvard Reference style with some errors
• Sentences and paragraphs are readable but with grammatical errors
• Vocabulary is limited.
• Document professionally presented in terms of KBS guidelines with significant exceptions
• Intext referencing and reference list format contains significant errors
• Meaning is often unclear • Comments are poorly structured
• Many grammatical, vocabulary and spelling errors
• Document poorly presented and many aspects do not comply with KBS guidelines
• Intext referencing and reference list format mainly incorrect
/10
Comments:
Assignment Mark/Grade: /30 Total
/30
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
GET ANSWERS / LIVE CHAT