MGT583 - Managing for Sustainability
Session 1 2016
Faculty of Business
School of Management and Marketing Internal Mode
Subject Overview
Sustainability is moving from the margins to the centre of business thinking and practice. In this subject we investigate what businesses are doing to adopt a more sustainable approach and evaluate how businesses utilise sustainability as a source of competitive advantage. Looking at a number of Australian and international case studies, the subject will attempt to analyse how individual businesses are attempting to align their activities to address global sustainability challenges such as climate change, resource scarcity and ethical conduct.
After an initial introduction to sustainability and sustainable development, the subject presents a number of theories, models and strategic options for sustainable business. Subsequently this concept of corporate sustainability is analysed from the perspective of a variety of stakeholders - customers, suppliers, investors, employees, the natural environment, the broader community and civil society.
Learning outcomes
On successful completion of this subject, you should
be able to define and explain the concepts of sustainability and sustainable development; be able to describe stakeholder theory and construct stakeholder maps for particular businesses;
be able to identify a range of frameworks for sustainability and assess a business's sustainability performance against these various frameworks;
be able to evaluate how the concepts of ethical behaviour and corporate social responsibility can be integrated into a business's sustainability strategy;
be able to identify, analyse and describe how sustainability can provide a source of innovation and competitive advantage to businesses; and be able to research and evaluate the social and environmental risks and opportunities which impact on a particular business, use these to build a sustainability strategy for this business, and create a plan for improvement over the next two to three years.
Lecturer Details
Subject Coordinator Belinda Moloney Email bfridey@studygroup.com Phone To be advised.
Campus Other
Building/Room number To be advised.
About your lecturer
Lecturer: Belinda Moloney
Email: bmoloney@studygroup.com (mailto:bmoloney@studygroup.com)
Dr. Moloney has been involved in teaching since 2004, contributing to tertiary teaching efforts in a number of subjects including Business on the Internet, Business & Computer Ethics, IT for Business, Services & Relationship Marketing, and e-Business / Web Design.
Learning, Teaching and Support Strategies
Class times and location
Class Times
Lecture 1: Tuesday 1pm-4pm, Room 2.07
Additionally you can also get the timetable from the timetable stand outside the academic office or via the notice board.
Important: It is essential that you keep checking the timetable for the latest class information. The timetable may change until the second week of the teaching session, and it is important to monitor the timetable regularly on the noticeboard.
The weekly instruction in this subject will consist of a combined lecture /tutorial lasting up to 3 hours which will occur every week. This will cover the main points from each topic.
Attendance is required at all scheduled lectures and tutorials.
How to contact your lecturer
Any questions concerning the teaching of this subject can be made by contacting your Subject Lecturer.
Belinda Moloney
Email: bmoloney@studygroup.com (mailto:bmoloney@studygroup.com)
Email is the best option. Please send a brief message regarding the issue. Include your phone number so a staff member can contact you via phone if that is more appropriate. When sending emails, please state the subject code and your name and ID number in the email title/subject. This will avoid your email being treated as SPAM.
How you are expected to engage with the subject
In this subject we will meet for a 3 hour session where we will discuss that week’s topic. Before you come to class you need to have looked at the online activities in the Interact site and read the text so that you can contribute to the class and derive more meaning from the activities that we will do in class. We will spend class time working through the topic questions, discussing them and preparing responses. In addition we may use video, games and case studies to enhance understanding of certain topic areas.
The modules for this subject have been written specifically to guide you through the sections (and questions) of the prescribed textbook relevant to each topic.
You should check the Interact2 Site at least weekly for postings, announcements, lecture information and other resources that will assist your studies or additional information and resources vital to your success in the subject.
Studying at university does not mean studying alone. During class you will have an opportunity to interact the lecturer as well as your peers.
Use the subject schedule to plan your studies over the session.
Academic learning support
Information on effective time management is available on the CSU Learning Support website via the following link: student.csu.edu.au
Visit the learning support website for advice about assignment preparation, academic reading and note-taking, referencing, and preparing for exams at: http://student.csu.edu.au/study
The Study Centres also offers a range of workshops specifically targeting the needs of international students. These workshops run multiple times per week and build into the comprehensive Academic Skills Development Program that all students should participate in. Additionally, a number of student volunteers are available to assist students in a program known as Discipline Support Sessions. Please see the timetables for these programs on the noticeboards at the campus and also with the iLearn Interact2 Organisation site.
You are expected to respond to all emails from the lecturer within three working days. For transparency and equity to all students, the lecturer will not join any private online discussion group in social media websites.
Information on effective time management is available on the CSU Learning Support website via the following link: student.csu.edu.au
Visit the Learning Support website for advice about assignment preparation, academic reading and note taking, referencing, effective time management and preparing for exams at: student.csu.edu.au You can also contact an adviser through Student Central on the following number: 1800 275 278.
Library Services
The CSU Library website provides access to online material and print, using Primo Search to find online journal articles, eBooks, hardcopy books from CSU Library (see Library Manager for Interlibrary Loan Requests), company & government reports, eJournals, dissertations, theses, newspapers including Business & Financial newspapers in Factiva (See Business & IT Journal
Databases), and other reference resources (eg. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian standards, online encyclopaedias & dictionaries to be read on the computer). You will also find library guides, Subject Reserve for any readings eg. ITC100, ACC100, etc., and online assistance to help you use the Library's resources such as Ask a Librarian – Live Chat and Ask a Librarian - Web Form.
You can find Library Services on both the SGA library online catalogue: http://primo.unilinc.edu.au/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=SGA
The SGA library online catalogue allows students to Sign In, My Account shows student’s current library record including all books on loan, Renew your borrowed books online before the due date, also Search and Request all books in the SGA library, even if unavailable due to high demand from students. Students can Request books when all books are on loan to other students. When the requested book is returned to the SGA library, the student who requested the book receives an email immediately to pick up the book from the SGA library. View your library record online 24/7 at the above web link for SGA library.
And also CSU Library online: http://student.csu.edu.au/library - CSU Library Services including Primo Search & Subject Reserve online with 24/7 access, online and video tutorials in research skills, finding journal articles for assignments, topic analysis, download Endnote referencing program and many other online library services to help you successfully complete your assignments for all CSU courses.
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ - Powerful search engine from National Library of Australia to access many different online resources on any subject from one search.
Contact Details for renewing loans, locating books and other information:
SGA Melbourne Library:
Marian Lees - Director, Library Services
Ph: (03) 9935 7921
Email: MLees@studygroup.com ( mailto:MLees@studygroup.com ) Library Help http://student.csu.edu.au/library/help-contacts Friendly and quick assistance is available. Ask for help finding information and navigating the library's extensive eResources.
Online Tutorials http://student.csu.edu.au/library/study-research/training-tutorials-videos Learn how to:
• use Primo Search to find eReserve material and journal articles
• search journal databases and web resources for information for your assessments
• identify appropriate sources of information and peer reviewed material, and evaluate resources.
Bookmark your Subject Library Resource Guide
Subject Library Guides are a great way to get started with research. Each online guide is tailored to a specific area of study, including Accounting, Business & Information Technology outlining how to research in your area and where to look for information.
http://libguides.csu.edu.au/
Academic Learning Support Assistance
Visit the learning support website for advice about assignment preparation, academic reading and
note-taking, referencing, and preparing for exams at: http://student.csu.edu.au/study You may also contact:
Name: Monique Moloney
Email: MMoloney@studygroup.com (mailto:MMoloney@studygroup.com)
Phone: (03) 9935 7919
For appointments, please see Reception.
Queries regarding the content of this subject should be directed to your subject lecturer
Your workload in this subject
CSU Academic Senate policy states that a standard 8 point subject should require you to spend a total of 140-160 hours engaged in the learning and teaching activities. This subject complies with this policy.
This means an average of 10-12 hours per week – obviously some weeks may require more time than other depending on how you work – but the following is a guide for your information.
The breakup of these hours are below:
Class participation - 36 hours (3 hours per weekly topic)
Class preparation - 36 hours (3 hours per weekly topic)
Work on assessment - 72 (6 hours per week)
Text and Learning Materials
Prescribed text(s)
Moscardo G., Lamberton G., Wells G., Fallon J., Lawn P., Rowe A., Humphrey J., Wiesner R., Pettitt B., Clifton D., Renouf M., Kershaw W. (2013). Sustainability in Australian Business: Principles and Practice. Milton, QLD: Wiley-Blackwell.
http://au.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-EHEP002341.html
This text outlines the key principles and practice of sustainable business, presenting a challenging and stimulating view of contemporary business for university studies. It provides both aspiring and current managers with a detailed insight into how sustainability principles can be applied in core business areas such as accounting, finance, marketing and production. Required reading / resources
In addition to the prescribed text, the following texts are well worth perusing:
Dunphy.D, Griffiths.A Benn.S. (2007), Organizational change for corporate sustainability:
a guide for leaders and change agents of the future. London: Routledge.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Stead, J. G., & Stead, W. E. (2009). Management for a Small Planet. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp
***Replacement Classes will be required for classes running on Mondays and Fridays in lieu of the
Public Holidays on 25 March 2016 – Good Friday | 28 March 2016 – Easter Monday ?25 April 2016 ( Monday) ANZAC Day. Please check the front page of this Interact Site for updated Room numbers and dates***
This study schedule has been devised to assist in your planning during the session, and is intended as a guide only.
Assessment Information
Introduction to assessment
To protect the academic integrity of the subject, you may be asked to complete an additional test ( which may be verbal) if I or another member of the teaching staff have doubts that the work that you have submitted for an assessment item is your own. This test would be held within 4 weeks of the submission of the assessment.
Detailed information regarding:
Sample exam (for subjects with a formal exam)
Pass requirements
Grades
Presentation
Submissions
Extensions
Penalties for late submission
Assignment return
Resubmission Plagiarism
are included in Appendix 1.
* due date is the last date for assessment items to be received at the University
** applies only to assessment items submitted by the due date
Assessment item 1
Stakeholder Mapping & Analysis
Value: 20 %
Due date: 20- Mar -2016
Return date: 13- Apr -2016
Length: 500 words
Submission method options Alternative submission method
Task
Consider the models of stakeholder theory promulgated either by Freeman, Mitchell et al or
Donaldson and Preston.Using one of these frameworks outlined in either the text or readings, construct a stakeholder map for an organisation with which you are familiar. You should include both internal and external stakeholders and be as comprehensive as possible. Using the model of stakeholder typology associated with your chosen framework, categorise these stakeholders appropriately. For example, on page 42 of the text , stakeholders are identified as dormant, demanding, dominant, etc.
Try to identify specific stakeholders that are currently being neglected by the current approach to business, especially those in the more influential categories (such as dominant, definitive and dependent). Then develop ideas on how you might correct the situation and engage more appropriately with these stakeholders. In no more than 500 words, summarise your approach to mapping and develop some initial engagement strategies for those neglected but more powerful stakeholders identified in the course of the process.
You will need to display both the map itself and the 500 word summary in a simple report format.
Rationale
The rationale of this early assignment is to ensure students are able to comprehend and apply to their workplace (or other organisation) a framework that is fundamental to their understanding of sustainability and to identify the interest groups that transcend the usual financial definitions of commerce to encompass both environmental and social concerns. Analyses from previous modules such as SWOT and PESTLE may prove relevant to this exercise.In particular this assessment is designed to assess Learning Outcomes 2 & 3.
Marking criteria
Criterion LO HD (85-100%) Analysis of stakeholder 2,3 The analysis of stakeholder theory shows evidence of theory identifies elements and research and reading, relates them to stakeholders, with the capacity to whilst explaining your selection support an argument of elements of theory that are through well structured, relevant to your organisation. cohesive and accurately Further, the analysis shows an
punctuated writing with ability to select and prioritise
evidence (8 marks) stakeholders with evidence from
literature and your own
experience, showing a broad perspective in cohesive and accurately punctuated writing.
Skills in stakeholder 2,3 The stakeholder map shows mapping include: evidence of analysis and
• Analyses and synthesis of case studies and the evaluation workplace to extract practical
• Use and practical applications of frameworks and application of literature literature to develop a stakeholder
and frameworks map that identifies and evaluates • Detailed analysis of stakeholder status, category and case studies their sphere of influence, power
• Active engagement and relevance.
with workplace and synthesis of information • Application in
practice
(8 marks )
Academic literacy and Structure uses clear and concise skills which include: topic and linking sentences, and • Citations and connected paragraphs. reference list that follows Sophisticated level of the APA6 guidelines professional language achieved. accurately; Paragraphs succinct with
• The quality of excellent ability with grammar, writing and presentation: vocabulary and spelling.
Impeccable referencing in APA6. Outstanding presentation and use of respectful language.
Charles Sturt University Subject Outline
MGT583 201630 SM I-6 February 2016-Version 1
D (75-84%) CR (65-74%) P (64-50%)
The analysis of The analysis of The analysis of stakeholder theory stakeholder theory stakeholder theory
identifies elements, identifies elements, identifies elements of relates them to relates them to theory that are relevant stakeholders describing stakeholders to your organisation your selection of identifying your selection and to select elements of theory that of elements of theory that stakeholders with are relevant to your are relevant to your evidence from
organisation, and to select organisation, and to select literature and your and prioritise stakeholders with own experience. stakeholders with evidence from literature evidence from literature and your own experience.
and your own experience.
The stakeholder map The stakeholder map The stakeholder map shows evidence of shows evidence of shows evidence of
analysis and evaluation of analysis and review of analysis and review of case studies and the case studies and the case studies and the workplace to extract workplace to describe workplace to extract practical applications of practical applications of applications of frameworks and literature frameworks and literature frameworks and to develop a stakeholder to develop a stakeholder literature to develop a map that identifies and map that identifies and stakeholder map that evaluates stakeholder evaluates stakeholder identifies stakeholder status, category and their status, category and their status, category and sphere of influence, sphere of influence, their sphere of power and relevance. power and relevance. influence, power and relevance.
Structure that uses Clear structure. Adequate Structure is apparent, paragraphs and sentences. use of sentences and fair use of topic and Extensive use of topic paragraphs. Guidelines linking sentences and and linking followed clearly. Solid paragraphs. Some of sentences. Leads the level of professional the guidelines
reader through the language followed. Only general
argument in a clear and used. Paragraphs are level of professional logical way. Follows succinct. Generally good language achieved. guidelines ability with grammar, and Adequate level of
comprehensively. control over grammar,
Professional literacy well fair ability with
F ( 50%)
The analysis of stakeholder theory fails to identify elements of theory that are relevant to your organisation and fails to select stakeholders with little or no evidence from literature or from your own experience.
The stakeholder map fails to show evidence of either analysis and review of case studies and the workplace or to extract applications of frameworks and literature to develop a stakeholder map, and fails to identify fully stakeholder status, category and their sphere of influence, power and relevance
No apparent structure. Poor sentence and paragraph construction. Guidelines not followed. Language not professional, inclusive or respectful. Paragraphs off the point. Inadequate ability with grammar, poor vocabulary and spelling. Insufficient
Page 8 of 24
Presentation
Assignments should be submitted via Turnitin in a simple report style.
Requirements
Assignments should be submitted via Turnitin in a simple report style .
Assessment item 2
Learning Journal
Value: 40 %
Due date: Variable
Return date: -
Submission method options Interact2 Journal
Task
For most of the first 10 weeks of the session, students are required to maintain a Learning Journal in the Blog section of Interact. A total of 8 entries are required for Weeks 1-6 and Weeks 9 & 10 respectively. Requirements for each entry are included in the relevant Weekly Modules. Weekly entries should be no more than 250 words and address the issues specified in the modules. Additional marks are awarded for regular participation in discussion forums for the relevant topics in Interact, hence it is strongly recommended that students keep up with the topics on a weekly basis. Dropping behind will result in discussions being missed and marks being dropped.
Rationale
Assessment Task 2 has been designed to test your understanding of the topic content for Weeks 1 to 10 and to assess how well you are able to apply these topics to 'real world' case studies and associated challenges and opportunities. Importantly all of the knowledge embedded in the modules is essential for your end of session presentation (i.e. Assessment Task 3). In particular this assessment is designed to evaluate Learning Outcomes 1, 4 & 5.
Marking criteria
Criterion LO HD (85-100%) D (75-84%)
Content & 1, 4, 5 Assignment work Assignment demonstrates knowledge of key demonstrates appropriate good selection and sustainability selection and integration of integration of theory.
theories and theory. Able to consider topics and frameworks Able to consider and issues in the broader including expand on topics and issues disciplinary context. breadth/depth of in the broader disciplinary Demonstrates breadth and
knowledge, use of context. depth of understanding and
literature/evidence Demonstrates breadth and has insights and awareness of research) and depth of understanding and of many of the deeper more
an ability to apply has insights and awareness subtle aspects of the topic these of deeper more subtle content.
appropriately to aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read ‘real world’ case Evidence of having beyond the core materials.
studies (15 marks) researched/read more Ability to apply these in a widely beyond the core consistent and appropriate
materials. manner to real world case
Ability to apply these in a studies.
consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
Students’ Learning journal shows Learning journal shows understanding critical reflection on your some critical reflection on demonstrated own experiences and your own experiences and
through reflection reflects the evaluation and reflects some evaluation and on their own synthesis of views from synthesis of views from experiences in study peers and work study peers and work collaborative or colleagues. colleagues.
shared work (15 marks)
Academic literacy Structure uses clear and and skills which concise topic and linking include: sentences, and connected
• Citations paragraphs. Sophisticated and reference list level of professional that follows the language achieved. APA6 guidelines Paragraphs succinct with accurately; excellent ability with
• The quality grammar, vocabulary and
Charles Sturt University Subject Outline
MGT583 201630 SM I-6 February 2016-Version 1
CR (65-74%) P (64-50%)
Sound knowledge of Knowledge of principles and principles and concepts. concepts sufficient to Relevant key theories, ideas communicate intelligently are included in the work in an about the topic.
appropriate manner. Demonstrates evidence of Demonstrates thorough having read material understanding of material presented in core texts and presented in core texts and readings. However literature
readings. is presented uncritically in a
Ability to apply these in a purely descriptive manner. consistent and appropriate Content acknowledged but
manner to some real world not really taken into case studies. account.
Some ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
Learning journal shows some Learning journal shows reflection on your own some reflection on your own experiences and reflects some experiences and on the evaluation and synthesis of views from study peers and views from study peers and work colleagues. work colleagues.
Structure that uses paragraphs Clear structure. Adequate and sentences. Extensive use use of sentences and of topic and linking paragraphs. Guidelines sentences. Leads the reader followed clearly. Level of through the argument in a professional language clear and logical way. Follows used. Paragraphs are guidelines comprehensively. succinct. Generally good Professional literacy well ability with grammar, and demonstrated. Substantial spelling; appropriate
F ( 50%)
Knowledge of principles and concepts insufficient to communicate intelligently about the topic.
Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. If evident, key ideas are presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts presented in the Unit of Study
Limited ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
Learning journal shows limited reflection on your own experiences and on the views from study peers and work colleagues.
Structure is apparent, fair use of topic and linking sentences and paragraphs. Some of the guidelines followed. Only general level of professional language achieved. Adequate level of control over grammar, fair ability
Page 11 of 24
Presentation
Students should make weekly contributons in the Interact2 Journal tool. Treat this as an exercise of reflection in your diary, so articulate your ideas clearly and concisely and keep the format simple and readable !
Requirements
Please create your Journal entries as you go and do not leave to the last minute, I shall be monitoring progress.
Assessment item 3
Strategy Presentation (Group)
Value: 40 %
Due date: Variable
Return date: Length: 25 Minutes
Submission method options Alternative submission method
Task
Concentrating on an organisation with which you are familiar, you will be required to compile and deliver a strategy presentation to your CEO (i.e. me !) in class. The presentation will need to summarise a sustainability strategy for the next 2 to 3 years for your chosen organisation. The presentation should be no more than 25 minutes and cover those elements of sustainability covered in Weeks 1 to 10. You will be assessed by the module convenor primarily on your knowledge of sustainability and ability to package and communicate this coherently. It is important that you do not simply regurgitate the current strategy of the organisation but focus on innovative sustainability ideas for the future and their tangible, strategic benefits for the organisation and how you will measure them.
More detail will be provided in class. Presentations will be scheduled across a number of weeks ( TBA ).
Rationale
Assessment Item 3 has been designed to test both your understanding of the modules and your ability to apply and communicate this knowledge in a workplace context, albeit somewhat synthesised.In particular this assessment is designed to evaluate Learning Outcomes 1,2,3,5 & 6.
Marking criteria
Criterion LO HD (85-100%)
Content & knowledge of key 1,2,3,5,6 Assignment work sustainability theories and demonstrates appropriate
frameworks – selection and integration of • Breadth/depth of theory.
knowledge Able to consider and
• Use of literature/evidence expand on topics and
of research) issues in the broader
• An ability to apply these disciplinary context. appropriately to ‘real world’ Demonstrates breadth and case studies depth of understanding and
(15 Marks) has insights and awareness
of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
Present your strategy clearly and Presentation is clearly cogently to your peer group structured with
• Clarity in explanation – information presented to clearly structured, developing an audience that is
argument understandable, supported
• Presentation skills by explanatory materials, • Recommendations for clearly understood aurally,
future practice. and includes
• Use of respectful language recommendations for to discuss all people; avoiding practice. Sophisticated emotive language; employing level of professional inclusive, non-sexist language. language achieved.
Charles Sturt University Subject Outline
MGT583 201630 SM I-6 February 2016-Version 1
D (75-84%) CR (65-74%) P (64-50%)
Assignment demonstrates Sound knowledge of Knowledge of good selection and principles and concepts. principles and concepts integration of theory. Relevant key theories, sufficient to Able to consider topics ideas are included in the communicate
and issues in the broader work in an appropriate intelligently about the disciplinary context. manner. topic.
Demonstrates breadth Demonstrates thorough Demonstrates evidence and depth of understanding of material of having read material understanding and has presented in core texts and presented in core texts insights and awareness of readings. and readings. However
many of the deeper more Ability to apply these in a literature is presented
subtle aspects of the topic consistent and appropriate uncritically in a purely content. manner to some real world descriptive manner. Evidence of having read case studies. Content acknowledged beyond the core but not really taken into materials. account.
Ability to apply these in a Some ability to apply
consistent and these in a consistent and appropriate manner to appropriate manner to real world case studies. real world case studies.
Presentation is clearly Presentation is well Presentation is structured with structured with reasonably structured
information presented to information presented to with information an audience that is an audience that is presented to an audience understandable, understandable, supported that is mostly supported by some by some explanatory understandable, explanatory materials, materials, clearly supported by limited clearly understood understood aurally, and explanatory materials, aurally, and includes includes some adequately understood limited recommendations recommendations for aurally, and includes for practice and use of practice. . Solid level of limited respectful language. professional language recommendations for
used. practice. Only general
F ( 50%)
Knowledge of principles and concepts
insufficient to communicate
intelligently about the topic.
Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources. If evident, key ideas are presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts presented in the Unit of Study Limited ability to apply these in a consistent and appropriate manner to real world case studies.
Presentation is poorly structured with information presented to an audience that lacks clarity, has limited supporting materials, mot clearly understood aurally, and lacks any recommendations for practice. Language not professional, inclusive or respectful.
Page 14 of 24
(15 Marks)
Peer engagement -
• Students’ understanding demonstrated through reflection on their own experiences in collaborative or shared work • Prompt response to questioning
(10 Marks)
Presentation shows critical Presentation shows some reflection on your own critical reflection on your experiences and reflects own experiences and the evaluation and reflects some evaluation synthesis of peer proposals and synthesis of views and responses. Further, from study peers and responses to questions are work colleagues.
prompt and Further, responses to comprehensive. questions are prompt and comprehensive.
Presentation shows some reflection on your own experiences and reflects some evaluation and synthesis of views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are mostly prompt and comprehensive
level of professional language achieved Presentation shows some reflection on your own experiences and on the views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are reasonably prompt and mostly comprehensive Presentation shows limited reflection on your own experiences and on the views from study peers and work colleagues. Further, responses to questions are lacking in promptness and comprehensiveness.
Presentation
The presentations will be held in class.
Requirements
Presentations will need to be submitted to the Lecturer via Turnitin on the evening prior to the scheduled presentation session.A hard copy should be handed to your Lecturer in class before your presentation.
Appendix 1 Assessment Information
Pass Requirements
This subject does not have an exam so:
You must obtain a total mark of at least 50% in order to pass this subject.
To be eligible for the grade AA you must have submitted all assessment items in this subject. If you choose not to complete an assessment item and receive an overall mark between 45 and 49 then you will not be granted an AA.
Grades
Final grades for this subject are awarded by the Business Faculty Assessment Committee in accordance with the University's Assessment Regulations. (See current Academic Regulations at https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.currect.php?id-00301#s3
(https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.currect.php?id=00301#s3)). University's Assessment Policy: Coursework Subjects (https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00301).
Your final grade for the subject as a whole will be based on the grading scale outlined in the CSU Assessment Policy: Coursework Subjects https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00301 ( https:// policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id =00301).
HD High Distinction 85% - 100%
An outstanding level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.
DI Distinction 75% - 84%
A high level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.
CR Credit 65% - 74%
A better than satisfactory level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.
PS Pass 50% - 64%
A satisfactory level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.
FL Fail 0 - 49%
An unsatisfactory level of achievement.
The percentages specified above should be viewed only as guidelines for the award of final grades.
The Faculty has an obligation to ensure that grades are equitable across different cohorts of the same subject offering and will undertake appropriate moderation processes to ensure that grades are awarded consistently in accordance with the University’s Moderation Policy.
For further information please consult the CSU Assessment Policy: Coursework Subjects http://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00301
Presentation
The following points are a general guide for presenting written assessment items.
Assessment items should be typed.
Use 1.5 spacing.
Use a wide left margin. Markers need space to be able to include their comments.
Use a standard 12pt font such as Times New Roman, Calibri or Arial.
Left- justify body text.
Include a separate title page with your name, student number, subject code, assessment number and assessment question. Include class time and tutor’s name if applicable.
Number your pages (except the cover page).
Use a header or footer with your name and student number on each page.
Always keep a copy of your assessments. Both a hard copy and an electronic copy.
Most importantly, always use your spelling and grammar checker, but remember that this does not pick up all errors. You must still carefully edit your work.
Submission
Online Submission
Assessment items that are completed within the Interact 2 site, such as quizzes, tests and self and peer assessments in the blog and wiki are noted in the assessment section above. You need to complete these tasks within your subject site.
Assessment tasks that are not completed through the Subject site need to be submitted electronically via Turnitin site by the due date. You will be allowed to add yourself to the Turnitin class once the class is set up by your Lecturer.
Other methods
Assessment 3 takes the form of a presentation to be delivered in class. A soft copy of the presentation is still required to be submitted via Turnitin the evening prior to the presentation date.
Extensions
In order to ensure that students who hand their assignments in on time are not disadvantaged, and to enable the lecturer to comply with the requirement to return assignments to the class within 21 days, the following rules about extensions will be strictly enforced:
1. Extensions cannot be granted for on-line tests, as these have to be done within a specific time frame, after which the answers are released to the class automatically.
2. Computer problems (such as the speed of your computer, Turnitin.com issues) and normal work-related pressures and family commitments do not constitute sufficient reasons for the granting of extensions.
3. If it becomes obvious that you are not going to be able to submit an assignment on time because of an unavoidable problem, you must submit your request for an extension to the Subject Lecturer in writing (email or post) prior to the due date.
Requests for extensions will not be granted on or after the due date so you must make sure that any extension is requested prior to the day on which the assignment is due.
You are expected to do all you can to meet assignment deadlines. Work and family-related pressures do not normally constitute sufficient reasons for the granting of extensions or incomplete grades.
4. If you apply for an extension, you may be asked to email your lecturer on what you have done so far on the assignment.
5. You must be able to provide documentary evidence ( such as a certificate from a doctor or counsellor) justifying the need for an extension as soon as practicable - but please note that if the circumstances giving rise to the request for an extension arise on a day when you cannot get documentary evidence, you must still apply for the extension before the due date and submit the documentary evidence afterwards.
6. Given the tight deadlines involved in returning assignments to students and putting feedback on Interact, the maximum extension granted generally will be seven (7) days from the due date .
7. Assignments received more than 10 days after the due date or extension date will not be marked unless the staff member decides otherwise. Items received late will be penalised at 10% of the mark available for the assessment item per day it is late (see below).
8. Note that for purposes of measuring lateness, the 'day' begins just after 00.00 hrs AEST - so an assignment received after midnight of the due date will be penalised 10% for lateness. This rule will be applied to all students uniformly.
Penalties for Late Submission
The Faculty of Business has determined that the penalty for the late submission of an assessment task ( without obtaining the Subject Coordinator's approval for an extension) will be :
10% deduction per day, including weekends, of the maximum marks allocated for the assessment task, i.e. 1 day late 10% deduction, or 2 days late 20% deduction.
An example of the calculation would be:
Maximum marks allocated = 20
Penalty for one day late = 2 marks (so, a score of 18/20 becomes 16/20 and a score of 12/20 becomes 10/20).
If an assignment is due on a Friday but is not submitted until the following Tuesday, then the penalty will be four days (40% deduction or 8 marks in the example above).
Submissions more than 10 days late will be acknowledged as received but will not be marked.
Assignment Return
You should normally expect your marked assignment to be returned to you within three weeks of the due date, if your assignment was submitted on time. If an assignment is submitted on time but not returned by the return date, you should make enquiries in the first instance to the subject lecturer. If the subject lecturer is not available, contact Reception.
Feedback
Your lecturer will give you feedback on your assignments in class.
Resubmission
Under normal circumstances resubmission of assessment items will not be accepted for any of the assessments required in this subject.
Assessment Requirements
Assessment at CSU is criterion-referenced and standards-based where students' work is assessed against stated criteria that reflect the expected learning outcomes of the course and subject. Subjects that use a satisfactory/unsatisfactory grading scale will have this clearly identified within the Subject Outline.
For further information please consult the University's Assessment Policy: Coursework Subjects ( https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id =00301).
Referencing
Referencing is an important component of academic writing. All CSU assessment tasks should be appropriately referenced. The specific details of the referencing requirements are included in each assessment task description.
For further information and assistance with referencing refer to http://student.csu.edu.au/library/integrity/referencing-at-csu
Plagiarism
Charles Sturt University expects that the work of its students and staff will uphold the values of academic honesty and integrity. The Guide to Avoiding Plagiarism is located at:
http://student.csu.edu.au/study/plagiarism. This is an important resource that will help you understand these values and apply them in practice. You should familiarise yourself with these requirements and ensure that all assessments submitted by you are your own work, have not been submitted elsewhere and comply with the University's requirements for academic integrity.
The University has purchased Turnitin software. This software has two functions, a pre-emptive education function which students may use to check their own work prior to submission, and a plagiarism detection function which academics may use to check the student’s work for improper citation or potential plagiarism. Use by students is optional and is not a prerequisite for submission.
You are encouraged to check your work for originality prior to submission. You can register with Turnitin to create a Student Account under the CSU Turnitin Licence at http://www.turnitin.com/login_page.asp. Further information on how to use Turnitin is provided within the Guide to Avoiding Plagiarism: http://student.csu.edu.au/study/plagiarism/checking.
Appendix 2 CSU Learning and Teaching Policies
Minimum standards of consultation
According to the Academic Communication with Students Policy
( https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00139#s3) (clause 8 in section 3), when a student directly contacts a teaching staff member for information, advice and/or support (except in online teaching spaces) the teaching staff member will respond to the request within 3 working days. Clauses
19-21: Use of Online Discussion and Communication Technologies states that for each subject, the Subject Coordinator will be expected to set up and/or activate an appropriate asynchronous communication technology and respond at least once a week to student messages that request information and advice.
The Higher Degree by Research Candidates Policy - Academic Communication
( https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00283) states that a Communication Plan, a documented agreement between a HDR candidate and his/her supervisory team that establishes common understandings and expectations of how and when communication will occur during the candidature will be developed. The Plan should then be reviewed regularly throughout candidature.
University Policies and Regulations
Academic matters are defined by, and are subject to, Charles Sturt University policies and regulations. Your Subject Outline should be read in conjunction with all such academic regulations and policies, as some of these may affect the outcome of your studies.
Academic Progress Regulations
The University requires each student to progress through his or her course at a rate that will enable him or her to complete the course in a specified maximum time. This maximum time is intended to ensure the currency of the knowledge within the course and therefore professional suitability of graduates. Failure to complete within the specified maximum time shall lead to the expiry of a student?s enrolment in the course. The University believes that all students have a right to know in advance of study in their course exactly what constitutes satisfactory progress in that course. To this end the University will specify a maximum completion time for each course, and will also provide support to students identified as being at risk of exclusion.
The Academic Progress Policy (https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00250) sets out the requirements and procedures for satisfactory academic progress, for the exclusion of students who fail to progress satisfactorily and for the termination of enrolment for students who fail to complete in the maximum allowed time.
Variations to Subject Outlines
Should it be necessary to change the content of the Subject Outline during a teaching session, it will be done in consultation with the Head of School and other support services of the University. You then will be notified of the changes in writing by the subject coordinator.
Variations to Assessment
Should it be necessary to vary the assessment in this subject, you will be notified in writing by the Subject Coordinator, or Subject Convenor where one is appointed. The variations to assessment include variations to the assessment tasks and/or assessment procedures for assignments, examinations and any other assessment task published in the Subject Outline. The variations will be communicated only after the Subject Coordinator or Subject Convenor has obtained approval from their Head of School. The overriding principle is that such changes will not disadvantage students and is made in accordance with the Subject Outlines Policy (https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00267).
Evaluation of Subjects
It is University policy that all subjects are evaluated every time that they are offered. The University's Division of Student Learning administers the Subject Experience Survey through CSU's online evaluation system. Staff in the faculties and schools value your feedback very highly and take account of your comments when reviewing learning and teaching in each subject.
If you are interested in the details of any enhancements to this subject as a result of the latest survey, please contact the subject coordinator. Students can also view overall results for subjects via the Student Subject Experience Survey Results Portal: https://student.csu.edu.au/home/subject-experience-survey-results
Surveys for each of the subjects you are enrolled in for this session will be available for you to complete for a period of 4 weeks from the last week of the teaching session. An email message will alert you to the availability of the surveys online.
Please complete the subject evaluation by following the link:
https://P8.courseval.net/etw/ets/et.asp?nxappid=CS2&nxmid=start (http:// https://P8.courseval.net/etw/ets/et.asp?nxappid=CS2&nxmid=start)
Individual subject results are only reported to the Subject Coordinator and Heads of Schools after grades have been submitted for each teaching session (except where subjects have one student the results are not reported to staff).
Special Consideration
Academic regulations provide for special consideration to be given if you suffer misadventure or extenuating circumstances during the session (including the examination period) which prevents you from meeting acceptable standards or deadlines.
Applications for special consideration must be submitted in writing and include supporting documentary evidence. Such applications should be sent to the Student Administration Office.
For further information about applying for special consideration please refer to Special Consideration Policy (https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00298).
Assessment Regulations
The assessment practices of all University subjects are conducted in accordance with the University?s Assessment Policy: Coursework Subjects (https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00301).
Academic Conduct
The University expects that you, as a student, will be honest in your studies and research and that you will not do anything that will interfere with or frustrate the studies and research of other students. In particular, you are expected to:
acknowledge the work of others in your assignments and other assessable work; not knowingly allow others to use your work without acknowledgment;
report honestly the findings of your study and research; and use only permitted materials in examinations.
Details of expected academic conduct are provided in:
the Student Academic Misconduct Policy
( https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00279); the Academic Progress Policy (https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00250);
Students are also expected to be responsible in the use of University facilities and resources and to abide by University rules concerning the Library and electronic resources.
the Library Rule (https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00280); and the Computing and Communications Facilities Use Policy ( https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id =00145).
Copies of the Rule of the Library and Code of Conduct for Users of Electronic Facilities can also be obtained from the Library or the Division of Information Technology (DIT) Service Desk.
Penalties for breaching the above Rule and Policies include suspension or exclusion from the University.
Students also have expectations of the University and of other students in the cooperative endeavour of studying. Details of these expectations are provided in the Student Charter ( https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id =00268).
Residential school
There is no residential school for this subject.
Subject Outline as a Reference Document
This Subject Outline is an accurate and historical record of the curriculum and scope of your subject. The Subject Outline Policy (https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00267) (at clause 16(f)) requires that you retain a copy of the Subject Outline for future use such as for accreditation purposes.
Appendix 3 Support Services
Student Central
Student Central is the first point of contact for currently enrolled students to access all non-teaching services. Student Central liaises closely with Divisions and Schools to ensure the timely and accurate resolution of student enquiries.
You may direct your enquires in person to Student Central staff situated within the Learning Commons found on campus at Albury-Wodonga, Bathurst, Dubbo, Orange, and Wagga Wagga.
You may also contact Student Central through:
ask@csu.edu.au (mailto:ask@csu.edu.au)
1800 ASK CSU (1800 275 278)
Phone from outside Australia: + 61 2 6933 7507
Information on Your Library Services
Finding Information
CSU Library provides you with free access to over 600,000 books and 50,000 journals, and much more. Get an introduction to your library with the Library Orientation Toolbox ( http://www.csu.edu.au/division/library/find-info/toolbox ).
Primo Search
Finding the resources you need is easy with Primo Search
( http://primo.unilinc.edu.au/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?dscnt=1&dstmp=1328694476534& Search most of the Library’s collections, including online resources, print publications and CSU research. Plus, you can easily place loan requests, view your current loans, and renew items online.
Online Resources
You’ll find journal databases, eBook collections, and other useful online information sources listed under Key Resources (http://student.csu.edu.au/library/find-information).
eReserve
Some subject readings may be held in eReserve
( http://student.csu.edu.au/library/find-info/search-reserve). Online access is encouraged to help reduce CSU’s carbon footprint, however a printed copy of eReserve subject readings can be purchased through CSU Print
( http://www.csu.edu.au/division/student-learning/technologies-for-learning-and-teaching/csu-print ).
Borrowing
Your borrowing privileges depend on your enrolment. Visit Information for Students
( http://student.csu.edu.au/library/help/information-for-students) to find out what you are eligible for. The Library FAQs (http://www.csu.edu.au/division/library/how-to/faq) have more information on borrowing and access to resources.
Need help?
CSU Library staff are available to answer your questions by phone, Live Chat, email, forum, or in person. See Ask a Librarian (http://student.csu.edu.au/library/contacts/ask-a-librarian) for more information.
Keep up to date with what is happening in your Library through Facebook, Twitter and our blog.
CSU Library Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/CSULibrary) CSU Library Twitter
(http://twitter.com/CSU_Library) CSU Library Blogs
( http://student.csu.edu.au/library/about-your-library/library-blog )
Academic Learning Assistance
CSU’s Learning Skills Advisers can help you develop the skills you need to succeed in your studies.
Learning Skills advisers can help you with:
Understanding and preparing assignments
Study skills
Exam preparation
Time management
Notetaking and
Referencing and avoiding plagiarism
Learning Skills also have specialists in English Language, online learning and maths and statistics who can support your development in these areas.
Students can take advantage of online resources and workshops, forums and individual appointments either in person, or online. More information is available at student.csu.edu.au/study ( http://student.csu.edu.au/study ).
STUDYLINK provides access to a variety of short, non-award subjects in preparation for university study. Subjects are available throughout the year through flexible, online delivery, and each is designed to help you gain confidence, skills and knowledge for your university studies ( http://www.csu.edu.au/student/studylink/).
Student Support - http://student.csu.edu.au/support
A wide range of services are provided to support your student academic experience. Services are available on campus with relevant services also available via telephone and online. Services provided include:
Orientation
Student mentoring
Scholarship and financial assistance
Counseling support and referral
Academic appeals and legal advice referral
Disability, welfare and equity support and referral
Health and wellbeing
Social and recreational activities
Graduation
Indigenous student support
International student support
Residential Student Support - http://student.csu.edu.au/campus/residences/residential-advisors
The Residential Support Scheme operates across all campuses to provide for the pastoral care and welfare of residents and actively encourages student participation and involvement in all aspects of residential life. The residential community is supported and structured to provide an environment to support student academic achievement.
For assistance and initial contact go to
Student Central
Email: ask@csu.edu.au (mailto:ask@csu.edu.au) (mailto:ask@csu.edu.au)
Phone: 1800 ASK CSU (1800 275 278)
Phone from outside Australia: + 61 2 6933 7507
Career Development
Career Development (http://student.csu.edu.au/study/careers) includes a range of services, from first through to the final year of study, which support students’ self-assessment, awareness of opportunities, improvements to decision making, and gaining the necessary skills for making successful transitions post-study. This support is available face to face, via telephone and online.
Distance Education Outreach Team
Assistance for students studying by distance education with Charles Sturt University.
The DE Outreach Team is available to all CSU students studying by Distance Education.
We can assist you with:
Your orientation to CSU and DE study;
Study skills;
Preparing assignments;
Time management;
Online learning, and
Any other questions you may have about studying by DE at CSU.
We provide these services in a number of different ways including:
Outreach sessions to locations around Australia including group and individual sessions;
Advice and support via phone, email, and Skype;
Preparing assignments;
Online workshops;
Regional Study Centres, and
Online resources and social media.
Find us at:
http://student.csu.edu.au/study/de-outreach https://www.facebook.com/DistanceEDatCSU
GET ANSWERS / LIVE CHAT