Module code: BMA4005-20
Module title: Professional Practice
Assignment: A1. Digital Poster
Word count: 500
Contribution to module mark: 40% of overall grade
Assessment type: Individual
Weight 40%
Submission deadline: 13th May 2024 at 23:59
Module Learning Outcomes:
By the end of this module students should be able to:
LO1 Completion of a Professional Development (PD) Portfolio incorporating an updated CV, a LinkedIn profile and reflective logging.
LO2 Familiarisation with professional self-profiling comprising of skills, experience/qualifications, and knowledge.
LO3 Construction of a formative professional identity/personal brand.
LO4 Knowledge and understanding of the significance of professionalism and professional practice, incorporating reflective practice.
Assessment Task
BMA4005: Assessment 1 – Digital Poster (40% of the total marks)
Digitally produce an Academic Poster (formatted to A1) entitled with your name and the words My Professional Identity. Your word limit is 500 words (+/- 10%) and should have both visual-appeal and be robust in content.
The poster should incorporate sections profiling your leadership and customer service skills and aspirations.
The poster should also incorporate the following elements:
Your Strategy 2030 Bath Spa attributes:
• skills
• experiences
• qualifications
• career interests
• values
• and general interests
Also include well-chosen visuals and academic references, formatted according to Harvard. Your references will not be included in the word limit and are best formatted in a smaller font than the rest of the poster’s text.
Your poster should be individual, but you are encouraged to work collaboratively to support one another through to the final digital production of your finished poster.
You will submit your poster on VLE (instructions to follow). The brief for Assessment 1 will be covered in at least one of the workshops.
For all policies regarding submission of your work please refer to the Programme and Student Handbooks.
Submission Details
Slides should be submitted no later than midday, the day before you are due to present. It is university policy to cap all late submissions at 40%.
Learning Materials/Resources:
Recommended Resources:
• Carter, M. (2013), Designing science presentations: a visual guide to figures, papers, slides, posters and more. Cambridge MA: Academic Press. E-book available.
• D’Angelo, L. (2013), Academic posters: a textual and visual metadiscourse analysis. Pieterlin: Peter Lang. E-book available.
• University of Adelaide (2009), ‘Academic posters: writing centre learning guide’. Available at: https://www.adelaide.edu.au/writingcentre/sites/default/files/docs/learningguide-academicposters.pdf [Accessed 20 September 2021].
• University of Stirling (2011), ‘Guide to creating academic posters using Microsoft PowerPoint’. Available at:
https://ctl2.uwindsor.ca/tlconf/downloads/CreatingAcademicPostersUsingPowerPoint.pdf [Accessed 20 September 2021].
BMA4005 – Assessment 1: Poster presentation marking criteria (40% of overall grade)
Criterion Fail 0-39%
Poor quality D 40-49%
Satisfactory quality C 50-59%
Sound quality B 60-69%
Good quality A 70-84%
Excellent quality A+ 85-100%
Outstanding quality
Student engagement Weak or unsatisfactory engagement with the assessment evident. A satisfactory or ‘just enough’ engagement with the assessment evident. Overall, sound engagement with the assessment evident. To do well you needed to engage more. Good engagement with the assessment was evident. ‘Going the extra mile’ was noted. Excellent engagement with the assessment was evident. I noted your enthusiastic approach. Your engagement with the assessment was beyond excellent. Highest quality endeavour was apparent.
Content Weak on content. Superficial handling of content. Satisfactory only in terms of content. Lightweight handling of content. Average in terms of content. An expected content was produced. Above average in terms of content. Interesting/ stimulating content. Reasonably insightful. Excellence achieved in terms of content. Noteworthy quality. Very insightful. Outstanding in terms of content. Original content achieved.
Leadership and customer service profiling Added little to the poster. Poorly worded. Reflected an undeveloped professional identity. Added something of value to the poster. Weakly worded. Reflected an underdeveloped professional identity. A useful aspect of the poster. Soundly worded. It demonstrated a developing professional identity. A significant aspect of the poster. Very well worded. Demonstrated an emerging professional identity and enhanced the viewer’s appreciation of it. An excellent aspect of the poster. Impressively worded. Demonstrated a developed professional identity and completed the viewer’s appreciation of it. An outstanding aspect of the poster. Expertly worded. Demonstrated a developed professional identity and perfected the viewer’s appreciation of it.
Creativity Little creativity evident. More thought was needed here. Some creativity evident but lacking in interest for the viewer. Average in terms of creativity. Think about how you could make your poster stand out from the rest? Above average in terms of creativity. Thought applied to making your poster interesting for the viewer. Excellence achieved in creativity. The poster had a wow factor for the viewer. An outstanding standard of creativity achieved. An exceptionally creative poster.
Aesthetics and Structure Visually poor/weak. Unsatisfactorily produced and structured. Visually satisfactory only. Produced and structured to a passable standard. Visually sound. Soundly produced and structured. Visually pleasing. Very well produced and structured. Visually excellent. An excellent production and structure. Visually outstanding. Also, exceptionally well produced, and structured.
Written Comms Incomprehensible or unclear written communication. Errors evident. Comprehensible and clearly written communication. Generally, error-free. Generally, a sound standard of written communication achieved. A good standard of written communication achieved. Excellence achieved in written communication. An outstanding quality of written communication achieved.
Academic/
Harvard Little or no evidence of academic reading/ approach. In-text and post-script referencing errors evident. The student evidenced a satisfactory use of academic sources. Harvard applied satisfactorily to the poster. An academic approach was evident, including in referencing. As for C, with a greater depth of academic approach evident. . Evidence of wide academic reading and a rigorous academic approach. As for A but including insightful academic thinking.