This is an individual assessment.
This assessment provides a chance for you to reflect upon aspects of the unit and relate what you have learnt to your own situation.
You will need to provide 2 reflective writing responses:
1. Critically reflect on contemporary business issues and the impact they may have for you as an emerging and developing Engineer (approximately 500 words)
2. Critically reflect on your teamwork skills and provide evidence of your contributions to Assessments 2 & 3 (approximately 300 - 500 words)
Review your team charter and peer review feedback in order to complete this task.
Include your team charter and peer review feedback at the end of your reflective writing report.
Reflective Practice - 15%
CRITERIA High Distinction (80100) Distinction (70-79) Credit (60-69) Pass (50-59) Fail (0-49) Not submitted (0)
Contemporary
business issues: 50%
Identification of contemporary business issues Reflection on the impact of the issues themselves as an engineer Insightful and critically reflective response. Sophisticated understanding of contemporary business issues, including sustainability.
Insightful interpretation on the impact the issues will have on them as an engineer. Effective and reflective response.
Thorough understanding of contemporary business issues, including sustainability.
Clear and effective reflection on the impact the issues will have on them as an engineer.
Competent and
reflective response. Competent understanding of contemporary business issues, including sustainability.
Relevant reflection on the impact the issues will have on them as an engineer.
Limited reflective response.
Satisfactory understanding of contemporary business issues, including sustainability.
Able to identify some impacts the issues will have on them as an engineer. Lacks reflection. Unsatisfactory understanding of contemporary business issues.
Limited or no understanding of the impact the issues will have on them as an engineer. Nothing submitted
Teamwork skills:
35% Completed team charter
A thorough and wellpresented team charter submitted.
Feedback from peers and self, reflects a high level of focus,
engagement and A complete and wellpresented team charter submitted.
Feedback from peers and self, reflects a good level of focus,
engagement and A complete team charter submitted which lacks some detail in places.
Feedback from peers and
self, reflects appropriate engagement and Team charter submitted with some sections incomplete and/or lacking detail.
Feedback from peers and self, reflects limited engagement and An inadequate and poorly presented team charter submitted. Feedback from peers and self, reflects little or no engagement with team work. Nothing submitted
Team feedback provided
Reflection on teamwork
contribution to team effectiveness.
Insightful reflection that clearly links knowledge of effective teamwork with experience. contribution to team effectiveness.
Good reflection that links knowledge of effective teamwork with experience. contribution to team effectiveness.
Competent reflection that links knowledge of effective teamwork with experience. contribution to team effectiveness.
Reflection has some links between knowledge of effective teams and experience. Little or no reflection on effective teamwork.
Written skills:
15%
Language, style, layout, logical
flow
Precise and fluent expression which flows easily.
Sophisticated and complex style and structure appropriate for audience.
Uses a wide-range of highly appropriate vocabulary and discipline-specific terms.
Almost error-free spelling, punctuation and grammar. Clear, concise and cohesive expressions with logical flow. Style and structure are appropriate audience.
Uses a range of appropriate and accurate disciplinespecific vocabulary.
Occasional errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar. Reasonably well expressed and clearly flows.
Style and structure are mostly appropriate for audience.
Uses vocabulary and discipline-specific terms accurately.
Infrequent errors in spelling and punctuation which do not impede understanding.
Generally flows well, but not expressed as well as it could be.
Basic organisation and style show some understanding of audience.
Uses mostly appropriate vocabulary and key discipline-specific terms. Errors in spelling, punctuation and/ or grammar occasionally impede understanding. Lacks flow and may be difficult to follow.
Style and /or structure is inappropriate for audience.
Uses limited vocabulary or inappropriate word choices; disciplinespecific terms are misused or missing. Errors in grammar, spelling and / or punctuation that interfere with understanding. Nothing submitted