the answers should be according to the reports atatched herewith.
thanks
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title BIZ102 Understanding People and Organisations
Assessment Reflective Journal 3 – Laureate Professional Assessment
Individual/Group Individual
Length 800 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes a) Explain the importance of self- awareness and emotional intelligence, and analyse its impact on professional competencies
b) Integrate strategies to effectively interact with others in a diverse professional context
c) Identify and reflect on own strengths and their application in the business context
d) Reflect on feedback to identify opportunities for self-improvement and professional development
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of module 4.2 (week 8)
Weighting 25%
Total Marks 100 marks
Context
A key to self-directed learning is reflection. Reflection enables the ability to examine situations in order to better understand the surrounding context and identify potential improvements for the future. This assessment task builds on assessment 1 and 2 to further develop your awareness and reflective learning ability while also assessing your understanding of the topics covered in module 4. As with assessment 1 and 2, you must write your journal entry in the first person and should try to be as open and honest with yourself as you can.
Please also visit the Academic Skills blackboard page for an overview of reflective writing in higher education: https://laureate-
au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&co ntent_id=_2498857_1&mode=reset
Instructions
This assessment task requires you to do the following:
BIZ102 Assessment 3 Brief Page 1 of 5
1. Read and watch the learning resources in module 4
2. Complete the Laureate Professional Assessment as outlined in the module 4 learning resources
3. Compose your reflective journal entry addressing the questions listed below
4. Identify theoretical concepts reviewed in module 4 and examples from your professional or personal experience to support your ideas
5. Include at least three academic references to sources in the module 4 learning resources for this subject which present the theoretical concepts identified, to support your ideas
6. Follow the APA 6th edition style of referencing to cite your academic resources and provide your reference list
Guiding questions:
1. To what extent do you agree with the results of the self-assessment? Use examples from your workplace experience (or school experience) to support your ideas
2. What have you learnt about yourself from the results of this self-assessment?
3. What specific theoretical concepts from this module give you the greatest understanding of your LPA results and how?
4. Which LPA workplace competency will be most critical for you to achieve your career goals in a VUCA world? Explain which of your top 5 Strengthsfinder Talents would be most valuable in developing this competency.
Submission Instructions
Submit your Reflective Journal 3: Laureate Professional Assessment via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in BIZ102 Understanding People and Organisations. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
The Learning Rubric below is your guide to how your assessment task will be marked. Please be sure to check this rubric very carefully before submission.
BIZ102 Assessment 3 Brief Page 2 of 5
Learning Rubric: Assessment 3- Reflective journal: Laureate Professional Assessment
Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Laureate Professional Assessment reflection
and linkage to theory
40% Journal entry demonstrates a limited attempt to reflect on the results of the Laureate Professional Assessment, with no/limited attempt to apply theoretical concepts and to use professional/personal experience examples to support ideas.
Journal entry demonstrates a basic attempt to reflect on the results of the Laureate Professional Assessment, with a basic attempt to apply theoretical concepts and to use professional/personal experience examples to support ideas.
Journal entry
demonstrates an adequate reflection on the results of the Laureate Professional Assessment, with a critical application of theoretical concepts and use of professional/personal experience examples to support ideas.
Journal entry
demonstrates a thorough reflection on the results of the Laureate
Professional Assessment, with a critical and indepth application of theoretical concepts and
use of
professional/personal experience examples to support ideas. Journal entry demonstrates an expert reflection on the results of the Laureate
Professional Assessment, with an in-depth, critical and meticulous application of theoretical concepts and use of professional/personal experience examples to support ideas.
Professional practice reflection
30% Journal entry shows no or limited evidence of reflective thinking in regards to how gained insights from selfassessment could be used to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world.
Journal entry shows some evidence of reflective thinking and generically articulates how gained insights from self-assessment could be used to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world.
Journal entry shows evidence of adequate reflective thinking and generically articulates how gained insights from selfassessment could be leveraged to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world.
Journal entry shows evidence of thorough reflective thinking and clearly articulates how gained insights from selfassessment could be used to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world.
Journal entry shows evidence of thorough and critical reflective thinking and clearly articulates how gained insights from selfassessment could be used to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world.
Structure and flow of ideas
20% Journal entry does not present sufficient information, ideas or evidence.
Journal entry lacks logical/clear structure and flow of ideas, making it difficult to understand.
Line of reasoning is unclear and difficult to follow. Journal entry presents information, ideas and evidence sufficiently, however these require further logic and clarity.
Journal entry has a sufficient structure, however flow of ideas are a challenge and can be difficult to understand.
Line of reasoning is passable, however, can sometimes be difficult to follow and requires clarity. Journal entry presents information, ideas and evidence clearly and logically.
Journal entry has a good structure, with a good flow of ideas.
Line of reasoning is of a good standard and easy to follow.
Journal entry presents information and arguments in a logical and clear way, which is well supported by evidence.
Journal entry has a very good structure, with a strong flow of ideas; opinions and ideas are expressed in a clear and concise manner with obvious connection to topic.
Line of reasoning is clear, logical and easy to follow. Journal entry is expertly presented; descriptive, concise and informative, exceptionally developed and well supported by evidence.
Journal entry has an excellent structure, with a strong, clear flow of ideas; engages and sustains the audience’s interest in the topic and
the reader can immediately grasp the relevancy.
Line of reasoning is excellent; demonstrating a clear, logical flow of ideas and arguments that are easy to follow.
Correct citation of key resources
10%
Does not use sufficient sources.
Does not include correct references or intext citations; does not use APA 6th style.
Uses sufficient sources, however can be greatly improved.
Attempts to include references or in-text citations, however these are sometimes insufficient for research purposes, or incorrect; Shows good evidence of attempts to source information.
Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th style, however may contain minor citation or referencing errors. Shows evidence of wide scope for sourcing evidence.
Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th style, containing minimal and or no errors. Shows evidence of extensive scope for
sourcing evidence

Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th style, containing no errors.
uses APA 6th style, however may contain some citation or referencing errors.