ICT203
Assessment 2
Assessment type: Group assessment
Purpose: This assessment will allow students to develop a website. This assessment contributes to
learning outcomes c and d.
Value: 50% (Project plan 10%; Group report 25%; Group presentation 15%)
Due Date: Week 4 (Project plan); Week 10 (Group report); Weeks 11-12 (Group presentations)
King's Own
ICT203
Assessment 2 - Rubric Marking for Project Plan (10%), Due week 4
Assessment topic: Group Project (3-5 members in a group): project plan(500 words — will be discussed in
class), report with working prototype (2,500 words) and presentation (15 minutes).
Task Details: This assessment requires students to design a website of their choice in their area of interest.
Students are required to develop a prototype of the website. The prototype will be used to test the
applicability of interface design. Students are allowed to use any software tools of their choice to develop
the prototype. A group report needs to be completed and students must present the outcome of their
project. Students will be expected to answer the questions during the presentation about their project.
The project plan must include:
1)
2)
3)
4)
Title and description of the website
Design Plan (preliminary sketches of the website)
Members role and responsibilities
Project Plan (Gantt Chart and other related information)
Criteria
Answer the given
questions
itie and
Marks
esign Plan
Marks
embers
and
oles
sponsibility
Marks
roject plan
Marks
Criteria
Introduction
Marks
uality of Design
Marks
Prototype,
velopment
Marks
onclusion,
Unsatisfactory
Fail
(0 - 49%)
itie is not clear and
rrelevant to the
roject, no
f the project provided
o specification in the
orm of a prototype or
rocess; provided the
napplicable cÄgn
Ian
embers roles and
sponsibility are not
lear and specific
he control and
xecution of a project
Ian is not clear and
nwnclng
Satisfactory
Pass
(50 - 64%)
itle is specific and
levant; the
ncomplete project
escription is provided
ome specification in
e form of a
rototype or process
s provided in the
esign plan
embers roles and
sponsibility are clear
ith some of the
pecific details
he and
xecution of a project
Ian is clear but the
upporting contents
hich required from a
roject plan is not
rovided
Effective
Credit
(65 - 74%)
ltle is specific and
levant; provided the
mplete project
escription
st of the
pecification in the
rm of a prototype or
cess is provided in
he design plan
mbers roles and
ponsibility are clea
•th mcEt of the
pecific details
e control and
xecution of a project
an is clear and som
the supporting
ntents which
uired from a
roject plan is also
vided
Credit
(65 - 74%)
Excellent
Distinction
(75 - 84%)
itie and project
scription are very
II written
II the specification in
e form of a prototype
r is provided
in the plan with
ome future scope and
limitations
Members and
responsibility are clear;
e distribution of the
project work is evenly
istributed to support
eir efforts
he project plan is well
written with most of
King's Own
Exceptional
High Distinction
(85 -100%)
ltle and project
escription are very
II written and
dditional sections
ave been added for
lari
I the specification in
he form of a prototype
process is provided
n the design plan; also
ered the future
ope and limitations i
erms of real-world
pplications
mbers roles and
ponsibility are very
II written; the
istribution of their
oject work is
upported with enough
idence
e project plan is very
II — written with all
The Report must contain following sections:
e required fields such he required fields such
a list, work s a resource list, work
breakdown structure,
eakdown structure,
project schedule, a project schedule, a
risk plan and the scope •sk plan and the scope
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Introduction of the report
Detailed design of the webpages and all interfaces
Prototype development with teasing and screenshots
Conclusion and Recommendations
References
Assessment 2 - Rubric Marking for Group Report (25%), Due week 10
Presentation: The students will give 15 min presentation and demonstration of their project.
ommendations, etc.
Marks
Fail
(0 - 49%)
o introduction given
irrelevant details
o design provided
irrelevant design
spects discussed
oor quality less than
% HCI rules
mplemented.
(8 golden rules)
o or lack
cohesion with the
Iscusslon, no or
imited
ommendations
vided
Pass
(50 - 64%)
ntroduction section
rovided with some
tails
me of the design
etails are given but
t clear
0/0-650/0 HCI rules
mplemented
(8 golden
nclusion does not
ink back
ystematically to most
ections, some basic
ommendations
rovided
work statement is
rovided
Distinction
(75 - 84%)
Introduction section
provided with all of the
required details in a
omprehensive and
ohesive manner
MCEt design details are
provided with relevant
xplanation
ppearance prototype
ubmitted. More than
5% HCI rules
implemented
8 olden rules
Conclusion links back
all sections of the
report, detailed
recommendations
provided
ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION T319 28/10/2019 13:25
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD O
ABN: 72 132 629 979
PAGE 10 OF 17
CRICOS 03171A
ICT203 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION T319 28/10/2019 13:25
*AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD O
Introduction section
provided with most of
e required details in
coherence way,
Most design details
re provided with
limited explanation
HCI rules
implemented
(8 golden rules)
nclusion links back
some sections of
e report, some
tailed
recommendations
provided
ABN: 72 132 629 979
work statement is
vided
High Distinction
(85 - 100%)
Introduction section
rovided with all details
resented
ystematically in a
mprehensive and
manner
xceptionally good
details are
rovided with all
quired explanation
nd supporting
uments
xceptionally
rofessional working
rototype submitted, All
Cl rules
Implemented
8 olden rules
onclusion
emonstrates a deep
nderstanding of the
roposed solution and
lates back to all
ctions of the report,
etailed
commendations
rovided
PAGE 11 OF 17
CRICOS 03171A
Approved by KOI Acadcmic Board for T3 2019
Approved by KOI Acadcmic Board for T3 2019