ASSESSMENT BRIEF
COURSE: Bachelor of Business/Bachelor of Accounting
Unit Code: OGBH 201
Unit Title: Organisational Behaviour
Type of Assessment: Project 2 – Group Oral Presentation and Group Report
Length/Duration: Group Presentation: 2 speakers, 8-10 lecture slides, 15 minutes to present. Group report : 2000 words
Unit Learning Outcomes addressed: 1.Interpret and describe the contemporary theoretical frameworks and concepts of organisational behaviour;
2.Analyse and outline different types of human behaviour in the workplace;
3.Assess how an evidence-based approach can be applied to interpret management and organisational behaviour;
4.Implement personal and interpersonal skills and knowledge to manage oneself and others effectively in an organisational context;
5.Analyse the importance of teamwork and critically evaluate the methods that can be used to develop effective teams;
6. Hypothesise organisational problems and develop strategies to resolve them.
Submission Date: Weeks 10 to 12 in the tutorials.
The Group Report and the slides for the Group presentation are to be submitted in soft copy in Moodle in Week 10.
Assessment Task: Each group is required to prepare and present a 15-minutes presentation on a topic as listed in the assessment description. The students are required to undertake extensive desk research to explore the issue. A Group Report on the task (within 2000 words) and the presentation slides should be submitted in Moodle in Week 9 as well as a hard copy to be handed to the lecturer in class before presentation.
Total Mark: Group Presentation - 20 Group Report - 40
Weighting: 60%
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 1 of 6 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051

Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formally
signed approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link FORM–Assignment
Extension Application Form–Student LoginRequired) or previously approved application for other
extenuating circumstances impacting course of study, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day,
calculated by deduction from the total mark.
For example. An AssessmentTask marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty for eachcalendar day.
More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link POLICY – Assessment Policy &
Procedures– Student Login Required)
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:
Working in a group of 3-5 students, you will give a 15 minutes oral presentation. All group members must present their part as per the group charter. Failure to present will lead to zero for presentation part of this task. The softcopy of the presentation slides, a written Group Report (within 2000 words) and other supporting materials (if any) are to be uploaded in the Moodle on due date as well as a hard copy to be handed to the lecturer in class on the day of presentation.
Students are required to identify and research into any business person which has a great influence as a leader in the business world. The leader may have offered a new product, discover something new, leading a successful business, make the customers happy or taking risks etc. Once the business leader has been selected, each Group can cover any three (3) to five (5) topics focusing on the leader (depending on the number of members in each group. Each Member must cover one topic). The suggested topics below as part of the presentation as follows:
1) Important decision (s) the leader has made
2) Sources of drawing inspiration or ideas from
3) Dealing with managers and employees
4) Visions the leader has for the organisation
5) Challenges the leader has to faced
6) Strengths and weakness of the leader
7) The risks the leader has undertaken
8) Lesson(s) we can learn about this person as a leader
9) Sources/area for leaders to find employees for its organisation Note: Every person in the group will get the same mark for the report.
Getting started
a) Select the leader that you intent to research into,
b) Book an in-class presentation time with the lecturer (may be preannounced),
c) Collect the information of your topic through desk research,
d) Present at least 10 images to be formed into slides for the presentation,
e) Prepare the presentation slide and presentation summary,
f) Rehearse the presentation in front of your friends and families or other group member,
g) Upload the presentation, presentation summary and supporting materials (if any) on due date,
h) Make the presentation in the class.
If you are absent from class at your presentation time, you will get zero for this assessment, unless you have a medical certificate or other extenuating circumstances. Please talk to your lecturer before the due date.
There will be, ideally, 4 to 5 speakers, 8-10 slides and an allocated 15 minutes to present.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 2 of 6 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051

The Group Report on the task (within 2000 words) and the presentation slides should be submitted in Moodle in Week 9.
Use PowerPoint to create the presentation, save it on a USB so you are ready to present in class. A hard copy of the PowerPoints must also be given to the class tutor on the day of the presentation, and must also be submitted through Moodle on the due date. A statement must be included on the Title Page stating the agreed % contribution of each group member.
Academic Learning Skills staff will give a workshop in class about Oral Presentations, which will be very helpful for this assessment.
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:
This assessment is a group activity and students are required to work with their respective groups. No individual submission will be accepted. Presentations will be organised on a pre-arranged time between week 9 and 11. You will not receive any marks if you are absent in your scheduled presentation time. However, consideration may be offered only under medical ground or other extenuating circumstances. You must provide appropriate supporting paper for consideration.
You will not receive any marks for this assignment if your group members collectively report against you for non-participation or non-cooperation. You have to nominate someone as your group leader to coordinate the assignment submission.
Presentation slides, written summary, and supporting materials must be submitted online in Moodle on due date as well as a hard copy to be presented to the lecturer in class. All materials MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Office format. Other formats may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in Microsoft Office format.
No paper based or hardcopy submission will be accepted.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 3 of 6 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051

MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC): Oral Presentation Rubric
Student Name Student ID
Elements %age Exemplary (1 point) Acceptable (0.6 point) Unacceptable (0.3 point) Points
1 0.6 0.3
Opening statement with purpose 10% Clear opening
statement, presenting
issue and organisation
for speech,
imaginative – catches
audience’s interest An opening statement
that states to key issue
and speech organisation No opening statement,
or opening remarks that
do not state the issue
Organisation 10% Clear organisation,
reinforced by media.
Stays focused
throughout Mostly organized, but
loses focus once or twice Loses focus 3 or more
times during
presentation
Content: currency & relevance 10% Research goes beyond
minimum
requirements. Strong
analysis Fulfils assignment
requirements. Current.
Uses appropriate
sources and is objective.
Reasonable analysis. Does not meet
assignment
requirements, is not
current, nor objective.
Does not use appropriate
analysis.
Quality of slides 10% Readable,
professional,
imaginative and/or of
high quality (without
being a distraction) Readable, professional,
appropriate number Sloppy and/or unprofessional. May be difficult to read. Many slides are superfluous
Quality of conclusion 10% Precise conclusion,
well organized, give
good
recommendation Reasonable conclusion,
semi organized, few
recommendation Irrelevant conclusion,
disorganized, no
recommendation
Voice quality, pace 10% Speaking
appropriately, clear
and sharp voice,
normal volume, rate
and quality Average in choosing
words, volume and rate Speaking inappropriately, weak voice, too slow
Mannerisms 10% Excellent use of
hands, arms, body,
and eye contact Moderate use of hands,
arms, body, and eye
contact Poor utilization of hands,
arms, body, and eye
contact
Delivery of contents 10% Communicate
effectively and explain
more than just
reading slides Average in explaining Just reading slides more
than explanation
Time 10% Appropriate length of
presentation. Time is
appropriately used Time is appropriately
used, but may run
slightly over or under
allotted time Time is not appropriately
used. Too long or too
short; or more minutes
above or below the
allotted time
Ability to answer questions 10% Handles all questions
with relevant, correct
information Answers 80% or more of
questions, but does not
expand on answers Unable to answer 25% or
more of questions with
correct information
TOTAL POINTS
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 4 of 6 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
Group Report Rubric
Student Name Student ID
Elements %age Exemplary
(3.75 points) Acceptable (2.25 points) Unacceptable
(1.25 points) Points
3.75 2.25 1.25
Content 25% The assigned task is thoroughly covered and completed. The primary thesis is clear and fully developed. Assertions made throughout the writing are compelling and clearly supported. The assigned task is covered sufficiently. The primary thesis is clear but there is some room for further development of the topic. Support is offered for assertions that are made but that support could be stronger, more compelling or more inclusive of all issues Does not adequately cover the assigned task. The primary thesis may not be clear or if it is, little topic development is evident. Assertions made in the writing are either weakly supported or no support is offered.
Organisation 25% Paper flows well with appropriate beginning, development, and conclusion. Paragraph structure contributes to flow and transitions. Organisation and /or headings help the reader to understand and remember information. Paper follows logical sequence with identifiable beginning, development, and conclusion. Generally proper use of paragraph structure and topic sentences. Organisation and /or headings help the reader to follow and find information. Paper lacks logical sequence hence causing format to interfere with readability. Does not use proper paragraphing. Topic sentences do not lead to rest of paragraph or are missing altogether.
Mechanics 25% No errors in word usage, sentence structure (run-ons, fragments), spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Strong mechanics help to establish credibility. Relatively free of errors in word usage, sentence structure (run-ons, fragments), spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. Mechanics do not detract from credibility of the content. Significant errors in word usage, sentence structure (run-ons, fragments), spelling,
punctuation, and capitalization. Errors undermine
credibility of content and readability.
Referencing 25% References (if called for) are consistently correct using Harvard style. No missing citations. Generally correct referencing (if called for) Harvard style. Some missing citations. References/ citations (if called for) are missing or do not use correct referencing style.
TOTAL POINTS
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 5 of 6 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051

GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS
Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.
Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a student must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System
(Moodle). For details please click the link
http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each Trimester.
Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE(5)references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any paper with less than five (5)references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.
Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism through Referencing) by clicking on the following link:link:http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources. Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council(NHMRC), or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites(Why can't I just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw
(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 6 of 6 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051