Topic: Discuss the critical issues relating to price setting, from a management accounting perspective, in contemporary organizations.
1000 words and APA referencing
Levels of achievements
Criteria Exemplary 75-100% Satisfactory 50-74% Unsatisfactory 0-49% Mark
Introduction (Purpose and scope)
S1
Weight: 25% The purpose and scope of the essay is made very clear, and directly addresses the topic in a focused and logical manner. The purpose and scope of the essay is clear, and directly addresses the topic somewhat. The purpose and scope of the essay is unclear, and does not address the topic.
Discussion Section
(discussion and critical analysis of the topic)
S1, S3, K2
Weight: 35% Discussions flow from your introduction section and is fully focused on the topic. The arguments are supported by scholarly research and your critical synthesis. Discussions flow from your introduction section and is focused on the topic somewhat. The arguments are supported by scholarly research and your critical synthesis somewhat. Discussions rarely flow from your introduction section and is occasionally focused on the topic. The arguments are largely unsupported and critical lack synthesis.
Conclusion
S1
Weight: 10% Clear conclusions that flow logically from body of essay. Conclusions are sound but could flow better from the body of essay. Conclusions absent or unclear with no real linkage to body of the essay.
Technical Writing Skills
(Grammar, Vocabulary, and coherence)
S4b
Weight: 20% No spelling errors, grammatically correct, with complete sentences. The paragraphs flow logically and are coherent. Demonstrates excellent evidence of discipline specific language and vocabulary choice. Some spelling errors, grammatical errors, and incomplete sentences. The paragraphs flow logically and are coherent somewhat. Demonstrates good evidence of discipline specific language and vocabulary choice. Too many spelling errors, grammatical errors, and incomplete sentences. The paragraphs don’t flow logically and are not coherent in most instances. Demonstrates insufficient evidence of discipline specific language and vocabulary choice.
Referencing
S4b
Weight: 10% Evidence of sound and appropriate amount of research. Sources acknowledged correctly with full reference details using APA style both in text and reference list. Evidence of adequate amount of research but not directly related to the topic. Limited acknowledgement of sources cited and errors in using the APA style in the text written and in the reference list. Evidence of poor or no research. No acknowledgement of sources cited and no evidence of use of references in the text written and in the reference list.
Report mark /20
(divided by 5) /100%