Written Industry Reflection
Length and/or format: 750 words
Purpose: Students are required to demonstrate that they can reflect in and on practice by reflecting on a clinical experience related to any of the module content. Evidence of critical thinking and analysis as well as a critic of personal actions should be demonstrated.
• There is 3 session read all module and write the reflection and do the assignment thanx.
________________________________________
Criteria marking:


Reporting and Responding :10%

Student has identified an appropriate critical incident or issue, and has: Reported what happened or what the issue or incident involved. Explained why it is relevant. Responded to the incident or issue by making observations and expressing an informed (referenced) opinion. Posed questions to address as a result of the incident


Relating :20%
Related or made a connection between the incident or issue and own skills, professional experience, or discipline knowledge Commented on aspects that they have or have not experienced before Analysed the similarities and differences between the conditions of this environment and the conditions of other environments they have encountered. Explained the extent to which their skills or knowledge will enable them to deal with the incident or issue

Reasoning :20%
Highlighted in detail significant factors underlying the incident or issue Explained and analysed their importance Referred to relevant theory and literature to support their reasoning Considered different perspectives – (eg theoretical or ethical) in relation to this issue


Reconstructing :30%
Explained how and why future practice or professional understanding has been reconstructed Described how they would deal with this next time Elaborated on what might work and why Identified different options and/or scenarios and hypothesised possible outcomes Explained how theories or relevant literature support their ideas Explored whether changes could be made to benefit other stakeholders

Integration of Reflective Components 5%
successfully integrated each of the elements (reporting and responding, relating, reasoning, and reconstructing) of the reflection. There is evidence that the reconstruction builds on each of the other elements. The four elements are linked clearly, cohesively, and logically.

Sources and Referencing 5%
Credible and relevant references are used. Accurate use of APA referencing style in all instances. A range of in-text citations has been used.

Sentence and Paragraph Structure/Intelligibility 5%
The writing is organised into paragraphs, and the information is organised appropriately within the paragraph. Each paragraph relates to a discrete idea. There are clear linking sentences that link each paragraph to the next.

Mechanics –
Grammar, Spelling and
Punctuation
5% There are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation that impact readability, and the meaning is easily discernible. The reflection reads without interruption.