Recent Question/Assignment
Case Study Group Assessment
HA3051: Accounting Theory
Sydney / Melbourne / Brisbane Campus
TRIMESTER 1 / 2015
Assignment
Instructions:
This assignment is a group (3-4 students in each group) assignment. Your lecturer will determine the maximum group size. Each group member is required to submit 500 words (e.g. if your group size is four members, 4 x 500 = 2,000 words). You are required to clearly identify each group member’s contribution on the hard copy.
Please note: no individual submission will be accepted.
This assignment carries weight of 20% of the total assessment value.
It is required to be submitted in as both a hard copy and a soft copy (Safeassign on your bb).
Your hard copy will be handed back to you once marked.
The date of submission is Week 9 Friday at 4pm. As per your student handbook, late submissions will draw penalties.
It is to be in a report format, complete with correct referencing
Assignment requirements
An extensive academic practical approach research paper has been provided to you, “Is stakeholder theory really ethical?”
As a group, you are to read the report, understanding its purpose and then discuss summary of Normative and Stakeholder theory. Do you think Stakeholder theory is a part or branch of normative theory? What are the issue identified in this literature and how you can resolve these issues?
This will require further research by your group to understand the background, a clear understanding of the relevance of each phase and a discussion as to where this will lead, what the likely outcomes are and why. You should consider and include the history and practices in Australia in your report. As a conclusion, you are to include what you have learned/understood from the paper and from your findings.
Assessment
Whilst it is expected that each submission will differ, assessment consideration will be based on the effort undertaken, the research and the understanding shown. Each assignment will be considered on the merits and quality of the submission. Poor presentation and referencing will draw mark deductions.
Please note: generally marks will be the same for all group members so it is important to ensure as a group, you are satisfied with your group members’ contribution.
HA3051: Accounting Theory
Sydney / Melbourne / Brisbane Campus
TRIMESTER 1 / 2015
Assignment
Instructions:
This assignment is a group (3-4 students in each group) assignment. Your lecturer will determine the maximum group size. Each group member is required to submit 500 words (e.g. if your group size is four members, 4 x 500 = 2,000 words). You are required to clearly identify each group member’s contribution on the hard copy.
Please note: no individual submission will be accepted.
This assignment carries weight of 20% of the total assessment value.
It is required to be submitted in as both a hard copy and a soft copy (Safeassign on your bb).
Your hard copy will be handed back to you once marked.
The date of submission is Week 9 Friday at 4pm. As per your student handbook, late submissions will draw penalties.
It is to be in a report format, complete with correct referencing
Assignment requirements
An extensive academic practical approach research paper has been provided to you, “Is stakeholder theory really ethical?”
As a group, you are to read the report, understanding its purpose and then discuss summary of Normative and Stakeholder theory. Do you think Stakeholder theory is a part or branch of normative theory? What are the issue identified in this literature and how you can resolve these issues?
This will require further research by your group to understand the background, a clear understanding of the relevance of each phase and a discussion as to where this will lead, what the likely outcomes are and why. You should consider and include the history and practices in Australia in your report. As a conclusion, you are to include what you have learned/understood from the paper and from your findings.
Assessment
Whilst it is expected that each submission will differ, assessment consideration will be based on the effort undertaken, the research and the understanding shown. Each assignment will be considered on the merits and quality of the submission. Poor presentation and referencing will draw mark deductions.
Please note: generally marks will be the same for all group members so it is important to ensure as a group, you are satisfied with your group members’ contribution.
Looking for answers ?
Recent Questions
Program: Master of Information SystemsAssessment 1: Portfolio 1 (Session 2 Topic: Input, Processing andOutput) Semester 2: Block 8-2024Course Code: MBIS4003 Course Title: Software Development Total Marks:...AssessmentAssessment item 2—Assignment 2Due date 11:45pm on Sunday, 24Nov.2024Weighting 35%Length Not applicableObjectivesThis assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes numbers 1, 2 and 3 as...Plan, construct and write a long-form essay on a particular area of media research that interests you. Using an established theoretical framework, explain how your research offers new insights into the...DescriptionIn this assessment, you are required to demonstrate that you understand how an Older Adult can develop mental health problems associated with cognitive decline leading to cognitive impairment...School of Engineering, Design and Built EnvironmentENGR7008 Fire Engineering Design and AssessmentAssignment 4: Peer Review of Fire Engineering ReportASSIGNMENT 4PEER REVIEW OF A FIRE ENGINEERING REPORTSee...Structural Analysis Etask 5The aim of this assessment task is to evaluate the appropriate use of the Force Method and Moment Distribution Method for structural analysis• Please download the eTask4 from...Purpose:The purpose of this task is for the student to demonstrate how to create a holistic plan of care that is person-centred, trauma-informed, and recovery-oriented in focus.Description:In this written...Show All Questions